• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Tile C3 骨盆骨折经前路内置系统联合骶髂螺钉固定的生物力学研究

Biomechanical study of Tile C3 pelvic fracture fixation using an anterior internal system combined with sacroiliac screws.

机构信息

Orthopedic Trauma, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.

The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 27;16(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02348-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-021-02348-y
PMID:33773576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8004429/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

How to perform minimally-invasive surgery on Tile C pelvic fractures is very difficult, and it is also a hot topic in orthopedic trauma research. We applied minimally-invasive treatment using an anterior internal fixator combined with sacroiliac screws.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the biomechanical properties of different fixation models in pelvic facture specimens, using an internal fixation system or a steel plate combined with sacroiliac screws.

METHODS

Sixteen fresh adult cadaver pelvic specimens were randomly separated into four groups named A, B, C, and D. The four groups were respectively stabilized using a two-screwed, three-screwed, or four-screwed anterior internal fixator or a steel plate with sacroiliac screws. All models were tested in both standing and sitting positions. Vertical loads of 600 N were applied increasingly. Shifts of bilateral sacroiliac joints and pubis rupture were measured.

RESULTS

The shifts in sacroiliac joints and pubis rupture in the standing position were all less than 3.5 mm, and the shifts in the sitting position were all less than 1 mm. In the standing position, the results of shifts in the sacroiliac joints were group C < group D < group B < group A. For comparisons between A:B and C:D, P > 0.05. For comparisons between A, B:C, and D, P < 0.05. The results of shifts in pubis ruptures were group D < group C < group B < group A. In the comparison between C:D, P > 0.05; for comparisons between A:B, A:C, A:D, B:C, and B:D, P < 0.05. In the sitting posture, the results of shifts in the sacroiliac joints were group C < group D < group B < group A, and the shifts in the pubis ruptures were group D < group C < roup B < group A. For comparison between C:D, P > 0.05. For comparisons between A:B, A:C, A:D, B:C, and B:D, P < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

Use of an anterior internal fixator combined with sacroiliac screws effectively stabilized Tile C3 pelvic fractures. The stability of specimens increased as the number of screws in the internal fixator increased.

摘要

背景

如何对 Tile C 型骨盆骨折进行微创治疗是非常困难的,这也是骨科创伤研究的热点。我们应用前路内置物结合骶髂螺钉微创治疗。

目的

比较骨盆骨折标本中不同固定模型的生物力学特性,采用内置物系统或钢板结合骶髂螺钉。

方法

将 16 具新鲜成人尸体骨盆标本随机分为 A、B、C、D 四组,分别采用双螺钉、三螺钉、四螺钉前路内置物或钢板结合骶髂螺钉固定。所有模型均在站立位和坐位进行测试。逐渐施加 600N 的垂直载荷。测量双侧骶髂关节和耻骨联合的移位及耻骨联合断裂。

结果

站立位时骶髂关节和耻骨联合的移位均小于 3.5mm,坐位时均小于 1mm。站立位时,骶髂关节的移位结果为 C 组<D 组<B 组<A 组。A 组与 B 组、C 组与 D 组比较,P>0.05。A 组、B:C 组、D 组比较,P<0.05。耻骨联合断裂的移位结果为 D 组<C 组<B 组<A 组。C 组与 D 组比较,P>0.05;A 组与 B 组、A 组与 C 组、A 组与 D 组、B 组与 C 组、B 组与 D 组比较,P<0.05。坐位时,骶髂关节的移位结果为 C 组<D 组<B 组<A 组,耻骨联合的断裂的移位结果为 D 组<C 组<B 组<A 组。C 组与 D 组比较,P>0.05;A 组与 B 组、A 组与 C 组、A 组与 D 组、B 组与 C 组、B 组与 D 组比较,P<0.05。

结论

前路内置物结合骶髂螺钉有效固定 Tile C3 型骨盆骨折,内置物中螺钉数量的增加可提高标本的稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/1a4d44c5c93a/13018_2021_2348_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/8c8c4c42b32e/13018_2021_2348_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/dd365ee2b1e2/13018_2021_2348_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/fbf40dc75199/13018_2021_2348_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/4cbf9ee34389/13018_2021_2348_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/3a8ba1d14915/13018_2021_2348_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/7e00302dbb6a/13018_2021_2348_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/6afa67211e1b/13018_2021_2348_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/d733ae73c99a/13018_2021_2348_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/9c4480344eba/13018_2021_2348_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/8c4456e0d111/13018_2021_2348_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/dbee1dcc51df/13018_2021_2348_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/1a4d44c5c93a/13018_2021_2348_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/8c8c4c42b32e/13018_2021_2348_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/dd365ee2b1e2/13018_2021_2348_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/fbf40dc75199/13018_2021_2348_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/4cbf9ee34389/13018_2021_2348_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/3a8ba1d14915/13018_2021_2348_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/7e00302dbb6a/13018_2021_2348_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/6afa67211e1b/13018_2021_2348_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/d733ae73c99a/13018_2021_2348_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/9c4480344eba/13018_2021_2348_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/8c4456e0d111/13018_2021_2348_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/dbee1dcc51df/13018_2021_2348_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bff/8004429/1a4d44c5c93a/13018_2021_2348_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical study of Tile C3 pelvic fracture fixation using an anterior internal system combined with sacroiliac screws.Tile C3 骨盆骨折经前路内置系统联合骶髂螺钉固定的生物力学研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 27;16(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02348-y.
2
Biomechanics of Anterior Ring Internal Fixation Combined with Sacroiliac Screw Fixation for Tile C3 Pelvic Fractures.前环内固定联合骶髂螺钉固定治疗 C3 型骨盆骨折的生物力学研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 12;26:e915886. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915886.
3
Clinical application of anterior ring internal fixator system combined with sacroiliac screw fixation in Tile C pelvic fracture treatment.前环内固定系统联合骶髂螺钉固定在Tile C 型骨盆骨折治疗中的临床应用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 14;16(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02863-y.
4
Plate fixation of inferior ramus in pubis-ischium ramus improves mechanical stability in Tile B pelvic injures: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis and early clinical experience.耻骨坐骨支下段钢板固定增加Tile B 型骨盆损伤的力学稳定性:尸体生物力学分析和早期临床经验
Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Jul 12;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01262-8.
5
Biomechanical Comparison of Two Kinds of Internal Fixation in a Type C Zone II Pelvic Fracture Model.C型II区骨盆骨折模型中两种内固定的生物力学比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Sep 5;128(17):2312-7. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.163377.
6
[Clinical application of percutaneous iliosacral screws combined with pubic ramus screws in Tile B pelvic fracture].经皮骶髂螺钉联合耻骨支螺钉在Tile B型骨盆骨折中的临床应用
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Mar 25;30(3):202-207. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.03.003.
7
[Minimally invasive internal fixation of pelvic ring for type C pelvic fracture].[C型骨盆骨折的微创骨盆环内固定术]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Jul 25;30(7):660-663. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.07.016.
8
Biomechanical comparison of minimally invasive treatment options for Type C unstable fractures of the pelvic ring.骨盆环 C 型不稳定骨折微创治疗方案的生物力学比较。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.032. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Biomechanical study of three kinds of internal fixation for the treatment of sacroiliac joint disruption using biomechanical test and finite element analysis.使用生物力学测试和有限元分析对三种治疗骶髂关节脱位的内固定方法进行生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 19;13(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0858-2.
10
Biomechanical comparison of three kinds of fixation in fracture-dislocation of the sacroiliac joint.三种骶髂关节骨折脱位内固定方式的生物力学比较
Technol Health Care. 2019;27(1):89-99. doi: 10.3233/THC-181274.

引用本文的文献

1
Plate fixation of inferior ramus in pubis-ischium ramus improves mechanical stability in Tile B pelvic injures: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis and early clinical experience.耻骨坐骨支下段钢板固定增加Tile B 型骨盆损伤的力学稳定性:尸体生物力学分析和早期临床经验
Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Jul 12;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01262-8.
2
Effect of different lumbar-iliac fixation and sacral slope for Tile C1.3 pelvic fractures: a biomechanical study.不同腰骶髂固定和骶骨倾斜角度对 Tile C1.3 骨盆骨折的影响:一项生物力学研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Jun 26;25(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00776-0.
3
Clinical application of anterior ring internal fixator system combined with sacroiliac screw fixation in Tile C pelvic fracture treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical study of different fixation techniques for the treatment of sacroiliac joint injuries using finite element analyses and biomechanical tests.采用有限元分析和生物力学试验对不同固定技术治疗骶髂关节损伤的生物力学研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Aug 1;87:250-257. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
Midterm Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of the Anterior Subcutaneous Internal Pelvic Fixator (INFIX) for Pelvic Ring Injuries.前皮下盆腔内固定器(INFIX)治疗骨盆环损伤的中期影像学和功能结果。
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 May;31(5):252-259. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000781.
3
Treatment of Unstable Posterior Pelvic Ring Fracture with Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixator Versus Locking Compression Plate: A Comparative Study.
前环内固定系统联合骶髂螺钉固定在Tile C 型骨盆骨折治疗中的临床应用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 14;16(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02863-y.
椎弓根螺钉棒固定器与锁定加压钢板治疗不稳定型骨盆后环骨折的对比研究
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Oct 17;22:3764-3770. doi: 10.12659/msm.900673.
4
"Anterior subcutaneous pelvic internal fixator (INFIX), Is it safe?" A cadaveric study.“前路皮下骨盆内固定器(INFIX)是否安全?”一项尸体研究。
Injury. 2016 Oct;47(10):2077-2080. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
5
The Anterior Subcutaneous Pelvic Fixator (INFIX) in an Anterior Posterior Compression Type 3 Pelvic Fracture.前路皮下骨盆固定器(INFIX)治疗前后位压缩型3型骨盆骨折
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Aug;30 Suppl 2:S21-2. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000583.
6
Measurement of Optimal Insertion Angle for Iliosacral Screw Fixation Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans.使用三维计算机断层扫描测量髂骶螺钉固定的最佳插入角度
Clin Orthop Surg. 2016 Jun;8(2):133-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2016.8.2.133. Epub 2016 May 10.
7
Biomechanical Comparison of Two Kinds of Internal Fixation in a Type C Zone II Pelvic Fracture Model.C型II区骨盆骨折模型中两种内固定的生物力学比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Sep 5;128(17):2312-7. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.163377.
8
Supplemental S1 fixation for type C pelvic ring injuries: biomechanical study of a long iliosacral versus a transsacral screw.C型骨盆环损伤的补充S1固定:长髂骶螺钉与经骶骨螺钉的生物力学研究
J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Dec;16(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s10195-015-0357-8. Epub 2015 May 31.
9
Three-dimensional navigation is more accurate than two-dimensional navigation or conventional fluoroscopy for percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation in the dysmorphic sacrum: a randomized multicenter study.在形态异常的骶骨中,三维导航在经皮骶髂螺钉固定方面比二维导航或传统透视更准确:一项随机多中心研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Dec;28(12):707-10. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000092.
10
Iliosacral screw insertion using CT-3D-fluoroscopy matching navigation.使用CT-3D-透视匹配导航进行髂骶螺钉置入
Injury. 2014 Jun;45(6):988-94. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Jan 19.