Suppr超能文献

使用生物力学测试和有限元分析对三种治疗骶髂关节脱位的内固定方法进行生物力学研究。

Biomechanical study of three kinds of internal fixation for the treatment of sacroiliac joint disruption using biomechanical test and finite element analysis.

作者信息

Wu Tao, Ren Xuejiao, Cui Yunwei, Cheng Xiaodong, Peng Shuo, Hou Zhiyong, Han Yongtai

机构信息

Department of Bone Disease, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei, China.

Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 19;13(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0858-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the stability of sacroiliac joint disruption fixed with three kinds of internal fixation using both biomechanical test and finite element analysis.

METHODS

Five embalmed specimens of an adult were used. The symphysis pubis rupture and left sacroiliac joint disruption were created. The symphysis pubis was stabilized with a five-hole plate. The sacroiliac joint disruption was fixed with three kinds of internal fixation in a randomized design. Displacements of the whole specimen and shifts in the gap were recorded. Three-dimensional finite element models of the pelvis, the pelvis with symphysis pubis rupture and left sacroiliac joint disruption, and three kinds of internal fixation techniques were created and analyzed.

RESULTS

Under the vertical load, the displacements and shifts in the gap of the pelvis fixed with minimally invasive adjustable plate (MIAP) combined with one iliosacral (IS) screw were the smallest, and the average displacements of the pelvis fixed with an anterior plate were the largest one. The differences among them were significant. In finite element analysis and MIAP combined with one IS screw fixation showed relatively best fixation stability and lowest risks of implant failure than two IS screws fixation and anterior plate fixation.

CONCLUSION

The stability of sacroiliac joint disruption fixed with MIAP combined with one IS screw is better than that fixed with two IS screws and anterior plate under vertical load.

摘要

背景

通过生物力学测试和有限元分析比较三种内固定方式固定骶髂关节脱位的稳定性。

方法

使用五具成年防腐标本。制造耻骨联合破裂和左侧骶髂关节脱位。耻骨联合用五孔钢板固定。骶髂关节脱位采用三种内固定方式进行随机设计固定。记录整个标本的位移和间隙变化。建立并分析骨盆、耻骨联合破裂和左侧骶髂关节脱位的骨盆以及三种内固定技术的三维有限元模型。

结果

在垂直载荷下,微创可调钢板(MIAP)联合一枚髂骶(IS)螺钉固定的骨盆位移和间隙变化最小,前路钢板固定的骨盆平均位移最大。它们之间的差异具有显著性。在有限元分析中,MIAP联合一枚IS螺钉固定显示出比两枚IS螺钉固定和前路钢板固定相对更好的固定稳定性和最低的植入失败风险。

结论

在垂直载荷下,MIAP联合一枚IS螺钉固定骶髂关节脱位的稳定性优于两枚IS螺钉和前路钢板固定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15dd/6006595/62b2138f5690/13018_2018_858_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验