• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证意大利语版的声学语音质量指数(AVQI)第 03.01 版。

Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) Version 03.01 in Italian.

机构信息

Head and Neck Oncology Service, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.

Otorhinolaryngology Service, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.

出版信息

J Voice. 2023 Jul;37(4):631.e1-631.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.029
PMID:33773894
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to validate the Acoustic Voice Quality Index version 03.01 in the Italian language (AVQIv3-IT).

METHODS

A total of 150 native Italian speakers with normal voices (n = 50) and with various voice disorders (n = 100) were enrolled. Voice samples of a sustained vowel (SV) [a:] and five phonetically balanced continuous speech (CS) samples were recorded. The most appropriate syllable number for a standardized voiced CS approximating 3 seconds was identified. Perceptual evaluations of the overall voice quality were performed by three expert voice clinicians using the G score of the GRBAS scale. AVQIs were calculated using a 3 seconds mid-vowel selection of the SV [a:] and the standardized syllable number of the CS. Finally, concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of AVQIv3-IT were analysed.

RESULTS

The most appropriate syllable number for a standardized CS approximating 3 seconds in Italian was identified as 25. The perceptual ratings showed robust intra- and inter-rater reliability. A strong correlation was found between AVQI scores and overall voice quality perceptual evaluations (r = 0.81, P < 0.001). The best diagnostic outcome for AVQIv3-IT was found for a threshold of 2.35 (sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 92%).

CONCLUSIONS

AVQIv3-IT was demonstrated to be a valid and robust tool for quantifying overall acoustic voice quality in the Italian speaking population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证意大利语版的声学语音质量指数(AVQIv3-IT)。

方法

共纳入 150 名母语为意大利语、嗓音正常的受试者(n=50)和患有各种嗓音障碍的受试者(n=100)。记录受试者发持续[a:]元音和 5 个语音平衡的连续言语样本。确定最适合标准化浊音连续言语(CS)接近 3 秒的最佳音节数。三位专家嗓音临床医生使用 GRBAS 量表的 G 评分对整体嗓音质量进行感知评估。使用 SV[a:]的 3 秒中间元音选择和 CS 的标准化音节数计算 AVQIs。最后,分析了 AVQIv3-IT 的同时效度和诊断准确性。

结果

确定了最适合意大利语 3 秒左右标准化 CS 的最佳音节数为 25。感知评分显示出较强的内部和内部一致性。AVQI 评分与整体嗓音质量感知评估之间存在很强的相关性(r=0.81,P<0.001)。AVQIv3-IT 的最佳诊断结果为阈值为 2.35(灵敏度为 90%,特异性为 92%)。

结论

AVQIv3-IT 被证明是一种在意大利语人群中评估整体声学嗓音质量的有效且可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) Version 03.01 in Italian.验证意大利语版的声学语音质量指数(AVQI)第 03.01 版。
J Voice. 2023 Jul;37(4):631.e1-631.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.验证法语版声学语音质量指数 03.01。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e11-646.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
3
Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.验证韩国人群中的嗓音障碍指数 3.01 版和声扰指数。
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):660.e9-660.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
5
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Spanish language.西班牙语版声学嗓音质量指数03.01版及声学呼吸音指数的验证
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 May;127(5):317-326. doi: 10.1177/0003489418761096. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
6
Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.《土耳其语版声学语音质量指数 02.06 版本的验证和重测信度》
J Voice. 2022 Sep;36(5):736.e25-736.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
7
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German.德语版声学嗓音质量指数 03.01 版和声学粗糙声指数的验证。
J Voice. 2020 Jan;34(1):157.e17-157.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.《嗓音声学质量指数量表(03.01 版)》的巴西葡萄牙语验证。
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):160.e15-160.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
9
The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.芬兰语人群中的声学语音质量指数第 02.02 版。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2020 Jul;45(2):49-56. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2018.1556332. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
10
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.韩语嗓音障碍指数量表的验证。
J Voice. 2019 Nov;33(6):948.e1-948.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Rapidly Evolving Scenario of Acoustic Voice Analysis in Otolaryngology.耳鼻咽喉科中快速发展的嗓音声学分析情况
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73491. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73491. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Analysis of Tracheoesophageal Voice after Total Laryngectomy: A Single Center Experience.全喉切除术后气管食管发音的分析:单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 27;13(15):4392. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154392.
3
Impact of cochlear implants use on voice production and quality.人工耳蜗植入对发声和音质的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 4;14(1):12787. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63688-3.