Suppr超能文献

门诊皮肤科转诊服务中银屑病患者的自付费用。

Out-of-pocket costs for patients with psoriasis in an outpatient dermatology referral service.

机构信息

Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.

Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

An Bras Dermatol. 2021 May-Jun;96(3):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.09.004. Epub 2021 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic disease that derives great costs to the health care system. In Colombia, due to deficiencies in this system, patients are more likely to incur in out-of-pocket expenses; money that has never been quantified in this country.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify out-of-pocket expenses and to analyze their relation to patients' clinical and labor characteristics in a cohort of psoriatic patients.

METHODS

A single-center, cross-sectional study was performed, evaluating psoriasis patients.

RESULTS

A total of 100 psoriasis patients were analyzed. We identified that patients with higher dermatology life quality index and in phototherapy treatment were the ones that had higher out-of-pocket costs (p = 0.006 and 0.005, respectively). We found no correlation between out-of-pocket costs and occupational status, psoriasis area severity index or other types of treatment. The largest amount of money was used to buy medications and bus transportation with a maximum up to 440.50 and 528.60 USD, respectively. Among the 100 participants the total expense was 11131.90 USD in a 6-month period.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Lack of measurement of the labor productivity and labor absenteeism secondary to sick leave.

CONCLUSION

Out-of-pocket costs are similar with what was shown in previous studies. We found statistically significant differences for the DLQI in comparison with out-of-pocket expenses, regardless of the PASI level. Phototherapy treatment also had statistically significant differences in relationship with out-of-pocket expenses, when compared to other treatments, because it requires higher expenses in transportation, copayments, and alimentation during appointment assistance.

摘要

背景

银屑病是一种慢性病,会给医疗保健系统带来巨大的成本。在哥伦比亚,由于该系统存在缺陷,患者更有可能产生自付费用;而这些费用在该国从未被量化过。

目的

量化自付费用,并分析其与银屑病患者队列中患者的临床和劳动力特征之间的关系。

方法

进行了一项单中心、横断面研究,评估了银屑病患者。

结果

共分析了 100 例银屑病患者。我们发现,皮肤病生活质量指数较高且接受光疗治疗的患者自付费用较高(分别为 p=0.006 和 0.005)。我们没有发现自付费用与职业状况、银屑病面积严重指数或其他治疗类型之间存在相关性。最大的支出用于购买药物和公共汽车交通费用,最高分别可达 440.50 美元和 528.60 美元。在 100 名参与者中,在 6 个月的时间内总费用为 11131.90 美元。

研究局限性

缺乏对因病假导致的劳动力生产力和劳动力缺勤的衡量。

结论

自付费用与先前的研究结果相似。我们发现,与 PASI 水平相比,DLQI 存在统计学上的显著差异,与自付费用有关。与其他治疗相比,光疗治疗与自付费用也存在统计学上的显著差异,因为它需要在交通、共付额和预约期间的饮食方面有更高的支出。

相似文献

3

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验