Santos Leandro de O, de Lanna Cristóvão A, Arcanjo Anna Carolina da C, Bisch Paulo M, von Krüger Wanda M A
Laboratório de Física Biológica, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 12;12:602653. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.602653. eCollection 2021.
strains recovered from human diarrheal stools (one in 1975 and two in 2001) and environmental sources (four, between 2008 and 2010) were investigated for the presence of virulence genes (, , and ), pandemic markers (, ), and with respect to their pathogenic potential in two systemic infection models. Based only on the presence or absence of these genetic markers, they were classified as follows: the environmental strains were non-pathogenic, whereas among the clinical strains, the one isolated in 1975 was pathogenic (non-pandemic), and the other two were pathogenic (pandemic). The pathogenic potential of the strains was evaluated in mice and larvae infection models, and except for the clinical (pathogenic, non-pandemic) isolate, the others produced lethal infection in both organisms, regardless of their source, serotype, and genotype (, , , and ). Based on mice and larval mortality rates, the strains were then grouped according to virulence (high, intermediate, and avirulent), and remarkably similar results were obtained by using these models: The clinical strain (pathogenic and non-pandemic) was classified as avirulent, and other strains (four non-pathogenic and two pandemic) were considered of high or intermediate virulence. In summary, these findings demonstrate that larvae can indeed be used as an alternative model to study the pathogenicity of . Moreover, they raise doubts about the use of traditional virulence markers to predict pathogenesis of the species and show that reliable models are indispensable to determine the pathogenic potential of environmental isolates considered non-pathogenic, based on the absence of the long-standing virulence indicators.
对从人类腹泻粪便(1975年1株,2001年2株)和环境来源(2008年至2010年期间4株)中分离出的菌株进行了毒力基因(、和)、大流行标志物(、)的检测,并在两种全身感染模型中研究了它们的致病潜力。仅根据这些基因标志物的有无,将它们分类如下:环境菌株无致病性,而临床菌株中,1975年分离出的那株有致病性(非大流行株),另外两株有致病性(大流行株)。在小鼠和幼虫感染模型中评估了这些菌株的致病潜力,除了临床(有致病性、非大流行)分离株外,其他菌株无论其来源、血清型和基因型(、、和)如何,在两种生物体中均产生致死性感染。根据小鼠和幼虫的死亡率,然后将菌株按毒力(高、中、无毒)分组,使用这些模型获得了非常相似的结果:临床菌株(有致病性且非大流行)被分类为无毒,其他菌株(4株无致病性和2株大流行株)被认为具有高毒力或中毒力。总之,这些发现表明幼虫确实可以用作研究致病性的替代模型。此外,它们对使用传统毒力标志物来预测该物种的发病机制提出了质疑,并表明基于长期存在的毒力指标的缺失,可靠的模型对于确定被认为无致病性的环境分离株的致病潜力是不可或缺的。