Suppr超能文献

采用多种方法测定特拉华湾和切萨皮克湾海水中和牡蛎中总致病性副溶血性弧菌和创伤弧菌的季节性和地理差异。

Seasonal and Geographical Differences in Total and Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus Levels in Seawater and Oysters from the Delaware and Chesapeake Bays Determined Using Several Methods.

机构信息

University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland, USA

U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Marine Spatial Ecology, Oxford, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Nov 10;86(23). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01581-20.

Abstract

Oyster and seawater samples were collected from five sites in the Chesapeake Bay, MD, and three sites in the Delaware Bay, DE, from May to October 2016 and 2017. Abundances and detection frequencies for total and pathogenic and were compared using the standard most-probable-number-PCR (MPN-PCR) assay and a direct-plating (DP) method on CHROMagar Vibrio for total ( ) and pathogenic ( and ) genes and total () and pathogenic () genes. The colony overlay procedure for peptidases (COPP) assay was evaluated for total DP had high false-negative rates (14 to 77%) for most PCR targets and was deemed unsatisfactory. Logistic regression models of the COPP assay showed high concordances with MPN-PCR for and and in oysters (85.7 to 90.9%) and seawater (81.1 to 92.7%) when seawater temperature and salinity were factored into the model, suggesting that the COPP assay could potentially serve as a more rapid method to detect vibrios in oysters and seawater. Differences in total and pathogenic abundances between state sampling sites over different collection years were contrasted for oysters and seawater by MPN-PCR. Abundances of and were ∼8-fold higher in Delaware oysters than in Maryland oysters, whereas abundances of were nearly identical. For Delaware oysters, 93.5% were both and , compared to only 19.2% in Maryland. These results indicate that pathogenic was more prevalent in the Delaware Bay than in the Chesapeake Bay. While and cause shellfish-associated morbidity and mortality among shellfish consumers, current regulatory assays for vibrios are complex, time-consuming, labor-intensive, and relatively expensive. In this study, the rapid, simple, and inexpensive COPP assay was identified as a possible alternative to MPN-PCR for shellfish monitoring. This paper shows differences in total and pathogenic vibrios found in seawater and oysters from the commercially important Delaware and Chesapeake Bays. isolates from the Delaware Bay were more likely to contain commonly recognized pathogenicity genes than those from the Chesapeake Bay.

摘要

2016 年和 2017 年 5 月至 10 月,从马里兰州切萨皮克湾的五个地点和特拉华州特拉华湾的三个地点采集了牡蛎和海水样本。使用标准最可能数 PCR(MPN-PCR)检测法和直接平板(DP)法对总菌( )和致病菌( 和 )的 和 基因、总菌( )和致病菌( 和 )的 基因进行了比较。对蛋白酶菌落覆盖程序(COPP)检测法进行了评估,用于总菌的 DP 对大多数 PCR 靶标具有很高的假阴性率(14%至 77%),因此被认为不理想。COPP 检测法的逻辑回归模型显示,在将海水温度和盐度纳入模型后,与 MPN-PCR 对牡蛎(85.7%至 90.9%)和海水(81.1%至 92.7%)中的 和 以及 具有很高的一致性,表明 COPP 检测法有可能成为一种更快的方法来检测牡蛎和海水中的弧菌。通过 MPN-PCR 比较了不同年份在不同州采样点的牡蛎和海水中总菌 和致病菌 丰度的差异。与马里兰州的牡蛎相比,特拉华州的牡蛎中 和 的丰度高约 8 倍,而 的丰度几乎相同。对于特拉华州的牡蛎,93.5%的同时含有 和 ,而马里兰州只有 19.2%。这些结果表明,致病菌 在特拉华湾比在切萨皮克湾更为普遍。虽然 和 会导致贝类消费者贝类相关的发病率和死亡率,但目前用于弧菌的监管检测方法复杂、耗时、劳动密集且相对昂贵。在这项研究中,快速、简单且廉价的 COPP 检测法被确定为贝类监测中替代 MPN-PCR 的可能方法。本文显示了来自商业上重要的特拉华湾和切萨皮克湾的海水和牡蛎中总菌 和致病菌的差异。来自特拉华湾的 分离株比来自切萨皮克湾的分离株更有可能含有公认的致病性基因。

相似文献

3
Effects of Intertidal Harvest Practices on Levels of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus Bacteria in Oysters.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jul 15;82(15):4517-4522. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00721-16. Print 2016 Aug 1.
4
Seasonal distribution of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Chesapeake Bay oysters and waters.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Dec 10;128(2):354-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.019. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
5
Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus Recovered from Oysters during an Oyster Relay Study.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Jan 17;84(3). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01790-17. Print 2018 Feb 1.
8
Effects of ambient exposure, refrigeration, and icing on Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus abundances in oysters.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2017 Jul 17;253:54-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
High salinity relay as a post-harvest processing method for reducing Vibrio vulnificus levels in oysters (Crassostrea virginica).
Int J Food Microbiol. 2018 Aug 20;279:70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.04.043. Epub 2018 May 2.

引用本文的文献

3
Comparative evaluation of specimen type and processing conditions for studying oyster microbiomes.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jan 8;15:1504487. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1504487. eCollection 2024.
5
Distributions of Fecal Indicators at Aquaculture Areas in a Bay of Republic of Korea.
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Nov 28;34(11):2223-2230. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2406.06001. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
6
Public health aspects of spp. related to the consumption of seafood in the EU.
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 23;22(7):e8896. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8896. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Antibiotic resistance trends among and isolated from the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland: a longitudinal study.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Jun 18;90(6):e0053924. doi: 10.1128/aem.00539-24. Epub 2024 May 29.
9
AssesSments of and levels and microbial community compositions in blue crabs () and seawater harvested from the Maryland Coastal Bays.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Sep 28;14:1235070. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1235070. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Forecasting Seasonal Concentrations in New England Shellfish.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 7;16(22):4341. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224341.
2
Vibrio parahaemolyticus risk assessment in the Pacific Northwest: it's not what's in the water.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 Apr 1;95(4). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz027.
3
Characterization of Pathogenic from the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland.
Front Microbiol. 2017 Dec 15;8:2460. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02460. eCollection 2017.
4
Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus Recovered from Oysters during an Oyster Relay Study.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Jan 17;84(3). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01790-17. Print 2018 Feb 1.
5
Environmental Determinants of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Chesapeake Bay.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Oct 17;83(21). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01147-17. Print 2017 Nov 1.
6
Differences in Abundances of Total Vibrio spp., V. vulnificus, and V. parahaemolyticus in Clams and Oysters in North Carolina.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Dec 30;83(2). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02265-16. Print 2017 Jan 15.
7
The evaluation of four recent culture-based methods for the isolation and enumeration of Vibrio vulnificus bacteria from oyster meat.
J Microbiol Methods. 2014 Feb;97:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
8
Rapid in situ detection of virulent Vibrio vulnificus strains in raw oyster matrices using real-time PCR.
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2010 Feb;2(1):76-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00092.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
9
A novel agar formulation for isolation and direct enumeration of Vibrio vulnificus from oyster tissue.
J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Aug;94(2):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 May 6.
10
Detection and differentiation of Vibrio vulnificus and V. sinaloensis in water and oysters of a Gulf of Mexico estuary.
Environ Microbiol. 2013 Feb;15(2):623-33. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12045. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验