Song Xuan, Weister Timothy J, Dong Yue, Kashani Kianoush B, Kashyap Rahul
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Intensive Care Unit, Liaocheng Cardiac Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 11;8:614380. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.614380. eCollection 2021.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is common in critically ill patients and linked with serious consequences. A manual chart review for ARDS diagnosis could be laborious and time-consuming. We developed an automated search strategy to retrospectively identify ARDS patients using the Berlin definition to allow for timely and accurate ARDS detection. The automated search strategy was created through sequential steps, with keywords applied to an institutional electronic medical records (EMRs) database. We included all adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2017. We selected 100 patients at random to be divided into two derivation cohorts and identified 50 patients at random for the validation cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the automated search strategy were compared with a manual medical record review (gold standard) for data extraction of ARDS patients per Berlin definition. On the first derivation cohort, the automated search strategy achieved a sensitivity of 91.3%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.1%. On the second derivation cohort, it reached the sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 93.3%. The strategy performance in the validation cohort had a sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 96.9%, PPV of 94.4%, and NPV of 96.9%. This automated search strategy for ARDS with the Berlin definition is reliable and accurate, and can serve as an efficient alternative to time-consuming manual data review.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)在重症患者中很常见,并伴有严重后果。通过人工查阅病历诊断ARDS可能既费力又耗时。我们开发了一种自动搜索策略,以回顾性地使用柏林定义识别ARDS患者,从而实现及时、准确的ARDS检测。该自动搜索策略是通过一系列步骤创建的,将关键词应用于机构电子病历(EMR)数据库。我们纳入了2009年1月1日至2017年12月31日在梅奥诊所(明尼苏达州罗切斯特)重症监护病房(ICU)住院的所有成年患者。我们随机选择100名患者分为两个推导队列,并随机确定50名患者作为验证队列。将自动搜索策略的敏感性和特异性与人工病历查阅(金标准)进行比较,以根据柏林定义提取ARDS患者的数据。在第一个推导队列中,自动搜索策略的敏感性为91.3%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值(PPV)为100%,阴性预测值(NPV)为93.1%。在第二个推导队列中,其敏感性为90.9%,特异性为100%,PPV为100%,NPV为93.3%。在验证队列中的策略表现为敏感性为94.4%,特异性为96.9%,PPV为94.4%,NPV为96.9%。这种采用柏林定义的ARDS自动搜索策略可靠且准确,可作为耗时的人工数据审查的有效替代方法。