Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale SE MSC11-6280, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2021 Aug 30;56(5):573-580. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agab012.
Negative emotionality is a key domain in frameworks measuring heterogeneity in alcohol use disorder (AUD), such as the Addictions Neuroclinical Assessment (ANA). Recent research has examined the construct validity of the ANA negative emotionality domain, but has not examined whether this domain demonstrates predictive validity for drinking outcomes. In this study, we examined the association between self-reported negative emotionality at baseline and drinking intensity 1 year following AUD treatment initiation. We also assessed whether coping motives for alcohol use at 6 months following treatment initiation and changes in coping motives mediated this association.
This was a secondary data analysis of a multisite prospective study of individuals entering AUD treatment (n = 263; 61.6% male; mean age = 33.8). Measures of coping motives and drinking intensity captured those who experienced a lapse to drinking. The associations between the ANA negative emotionality domain, coping motives and drinking intensity over time were assessed using a latent growth curve mediation model.
The ANA negative emotionality domain at baseline was indirectly associated with greater 7-12-month drinking intensity through higher coping motives at 6 months. Negative emotionality was not related to change in coping motives over the assessment period and change in coping motives was not related to 7-12-month drinking intensity.
This analysis provides evidence for the predictive validity of the ANA negative emotionality domain for coping motives and drinking intensity among treatment seekers who experienced a lapse to drinking. Coping motives may be an important target in AUD treatment among those high in negative emotionality.
负性情绪是衡量酒精使用障碍(AUD)异质性的框架(如成瘾神经临床评估(ANA))中的一个关键领域。最近的研究已经检验了 ANA 负性情绪领域的结构效度,但尚未检验该领域是否对饮酒结果具有预测效度。在这项研究中,我们检验了基线时自我报告的负性情绪与 AUD 治疗开始后 1 年的饮酒强度之间的关联。我们还评估了治疗开始后 6 个月的酒精使用应对动机以及应对动机的变化是否调节了这种关联。
这是一项对进入 AUD 治疗的个体(n=263;61.6%为男性;平均年龄为 33.8)进行的多地点前瞻性研究的二次数据分析。应对动机和饮酒强度的测量方法捕获了那些经历饮酒复发的人。使用潜在增长曲线中介模型评估了 ANA 负性情绪领域、应对动机和随时间变化的饮酒强度之间的关联。
基线时的 ANA 负性情绪领域通过 6 个月时更高的应对动机与 7-12 个月的饮酒强度呈间接关联。负性情绪与评估期间应对动机的变化无关,应对动机的变化也与 7-12 个月的饮酒强度无关。
这项分析为 ANA 负性情绪领域对治疗中寻求帮助且经历饮酒复发的个体的应对动机和饮酒强度的预测效度提供了证据。应对动机可能是高负性情绪个体 AUD 治疗中的一个重要目标。