Department of Medical Sciences, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut, USA.
School of Psychology and Counseling, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, New Jersey, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(8):967-974. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2201829. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
: To examine whether individual differences in intensive longitudinal data-derived affective dynamics (i.e. positive and negative affect variability and inertia and positive affect-negative affect bipolarity) - posited to be indicative of emotion dysregulation - are uniquely related to drinking level and affect-regulation drinking motives after controlling for mean levels of affective states. : We used a large sample of college student drinkers ( = 1640, 54% women) who reported on their affective states, drinking levels and drinking motives daily for 30 days using a web-based daily diary. We then calculated from the daily data positive and negative affect variability, inertia, affect bipolarity and mean levels of affect and used these as predictors of average drinking level and affect-regulation drinking motives (assessed using both retrospective and daily reporting methods). : Findings from dynamic structural equation models indicated that mean levels of affect were uniquely related to drinking motives, but not drinking level. Few dynamic affect predictors were uniquely related to outcomes in the predicted direction after controlling for mean affect levels. : Our results add to the inconsistent literature regarding the associations between affective dynamics and alcohol-related outcomes, suggesting that any effects of these indicators, after controlling for mean affect levels, might be more complex than can be detected with simple linear models.
:为了检验在密集的纵向数据中得出的情感动态(即积极和消极情感的可变性和惯性,以及积极和消极情感的两极分化)的个体差异是否与情绪调节障碍有关,我们控制了情感状态的平均水平后,研究了这些差异是否与饮酒水平和情感调节饮酒动机有关。:我们使用了一个包含大量大学生饮酒者的样本( = 1640 人,女性占 54%),他们使用基于网络的每日日记报告了 30 天内的情感状态、饮酒水平和饮酒动机。然后,我们从每日数据中计算出积极和消极情感的可变性、惯性、情感两极分化以及情感的平均水平,并将这些作为平均饮酒水平和情感调节饮酒动机的预测指标(使用回顾性和每日报告方法评估)。:动态结构方程模型的结果表明,情感的平均水平与饮酒动机有关,但与饮酒水平无关。在控制了平均情感水平后,很少有动态情感预测指标与预期方向的结果有独特的关系。:我们的研究结果增加了有关情感动态与酒精相关结果之间关联的不一致文献,表明这些指标的任何影响,在控制了平均情感水平后,可能比简单的线性模型更复杂。