Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Korea.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Apr;62(4):366-369. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.4.366.
The purpose of the current study was to compare prognostic outcomes between patients with high-grade ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs) and those with other low-grade SLCTs. We retrospectively reviewed medical records for 24 patients pathologically diagnosed with SLCTs between 2006 to 2019 at two institutions. The patients were grouped according to pathological grade: SLCT was classified as grade 1, well differentiated; grade 2, intermediated differentiated; or grade 3, poorly differentiated (Meyer's classification). Statistical analysis was performed to compare survival outcomes according to pathological grade. The median patient age was 42.5 years (range 16-75). Eighteen patients (75%) were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I, and none were diagnosed in stage IV. Nine patients (37.5%) were grade 3, and 15 patients (63.5%) were grades 1-2. When comparing clinical baseline characteristics of the grade 1-2 group with those of the grade 3 group, only serum CA125 level at diagnosis was significantly higher in the grade 3 group (38.34 vs. 382.29, =0.002). Five patients experienced recurrence of grade 3 disease, while no recurrence was reported in grade 1-2 disease. Four of the five recurrent patients died. In result, grade 3 ovarian SLCT showed significantly poorer prognosis than grade 1-2 disease (overall survival, hazard ratio=14.25, 95% confidence interval=1.881-108.0; log-rank =0.010). Our findings were consistent with the concept that patients with stage I/grade 1-2 tumors have a good prognosis without adjuvant chemotherapy. Since grade 3 ovarian SLCT appears to be relatively more fatal than grade 1 or 2, patients with grade 3 SLCT might require more aggressive surgical intervention and post-treatment surveillance.
本研究旨在比较高级别卵巢支持-间质细胞瘤(SLCT)患者与其他低级别 SLCT 患者的预后结果。我们回顾性分析了 2006 年至 2019 年在两个机构接受病理诊断为 SLCT 的 24 例患者的病历。根据病理分级将患者分组:SLCT 分为 1 级,高分化;2 级,中分化;或 3 级,低分化(Meyer 分级)。进行统计学分析比较病理分级的生存结果。患者的中位年龄为 42.5 岁(范围 16-75)。18 例(75%)患者为国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期 I 期,无 IV 期患者。9 例(37.5%)为 3 级,15 例(63.5%)为 1-2 级。比较 1-2 级组与 3 级组的临床基线特征时,仅 3 级组患者诊断时的血清 CA125 水平显著更高(38.34 vs. 382.29,=0.002)。5 例患者复发 3 级疾病,而 1-2 级疾病无复发报告。5 例复发病例中有 4 例死亡。结果表明,3 级卵巢 SLCT 的预后明显差于 1-2 级疾病(总生存,风险比=14.25,95%置信区间=1.881-108.0;对数秩检验=0.010)。我们的发现与以下观点一致,即 I 期/1-2 级肿瘤患者无需辅助化疗即可获得良好的预后。由于 3 级卵巢 SLCT 似乎比 1 级或 2 级更致命,因此 3 级 SLCT 患者可能需要更积极的手术干预和治疗后监测。