Fitzpatrick G J, Moriarty D C
Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Br J Anaesth. 1988 May;60(6):639-44. doi: 10.1093/bja/60.6.639.
Forty-four patients undergoing coronary revascularization received either intrathecal morphine 1 mg (n = 15), intrathecal morphine 2 mg (n = 15), or i.v. morphine 30 mg (n = 14) after the induction of anaesthesia. Morphine 2.5 mg i.v. was given, as required, in the postoperative period and pain score, respiratory rate and PaCO2 measured every 2 h. FVC, FEV1 and PEFR were measured before, and 24 h after, the induction of anaesthesia. Mean overall pain scores in both intrathecal groups were significantly lower than in the i.v. group (P less than 0.01), but did not differ significantly between the intrathecal groups. Consumption of supplementary morphine was significantly lower in both intrathecal groups (P less than 0.01). Mean PaCO2 was significantly higher in patients given intrathecal morphine 2 mg. This was significant at 12, 14 and 16 h after induction of anaesthesia. Respiratory rate did not differ significantly between the groups. Postoperative PEFR was significantly better in patients given intrathecal morphine (P less than 0.01). These results suggest that intrathecal morphine provided better analgesia after cardiac surgery than did a conventional regimen. The lower dose (1 mg) was associated with less respiratory depression as assessed by PaCO2 measurements.
44例接受冠状动脉血运重建术的患者在麻醉诱导后分别接受鞘内注射吗啡1mg(n = 15)、鞘内注射吗啡2mg(n = 15)或静脉注射吗啡30mg(n = 14)。术后根据需要静脉注射吗啡2.5mg,并每2小时测量疼痛评分、呼吸频率和动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)。在麻醉诱导前及诱导后24小时测量用力肺活量(FVC)、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和呼气峰值流速(PEFR)。两个鞘内注射组的总体平均疼痛评分均显著低于静脉注射组(P<0.01),但鞘内注射组之间无显著差异。两个鞘内注射组的补充吗啡消耗量均显著较低(P<0.01)。接受鞘内注射吗啡2mg的患者平均PaCO2显著较高。在麻醉诱导后12、14和16小时差异显著。各组之间呼吸频率无显著差异。接受鞘内注射吗啡的患者术后PEFR显著更好(P<0.01)。这些结果表明,与传统方案相比,鞘内注射吗啡在心脏手术后提供了更好的镇痛效果。通过PaCO2测量评估,较低剂量(1mg)与较少的呼吸抑制相关。