Suppr超能文献

双相抑郁的忧郁特征与拉莫三嗪的反应:五项随机安慰剂对照试验的汇总分析。

Melancholic Features in Bipolar Depression and Response to Lamotrigine: A Pooled Analysis of Five Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.

机构信息

From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021;41(3):315-319. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001393.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A pilot study suggested lamotrigine may be more effective for bipolar depression with melancholic features. We tested this hypothesis in a pooled analysis of 5 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials of lamotrigine for acute bipolar depression.

METHODS

The pooled sample consisted of 1072 adult outpatients. Depressive symptoms were assessed for 7 to 10 weeks with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. The outcome measure was end-trial response (score reduction ≥ 50%). Melancholic features were assessed with both the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and baseline depression scale items, according to DSM criteria.

RESULTS

The item-based melancholic specifier was associated with numerically larger treatment effects, although subgroup-treatment interactions in logistic regression models did not reach statistical significance. The small subgroup of patients with severe psychomotor retardation also appeared to benefit from lamotrigine. However, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV melancholic specifier was not associated with larger treatment effects. Baseline depression severity was inconsistently associated with response, depending on which scale was used to define severity. The 2 melancholia variables had poor agreement despite having similar prevalences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not clearly support the original hypothesis but do reinforce the importance of replicating secondary analyses of clinical trials with additional data.

摘要

背景

一项初步研究表明,拉莫三嗪对于具有忧郁特征的双相情感障碍抑郁发作可能更有效。我们在 5 项拉莫三嗪治疗双相情感障碍抑郁发作的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的汇总分析中检验了这一假说。

方法

汇总样本包括 1072 例成年门诊患者。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表评估 7 至 10 周的抑郁症状。主要终点是治疗结束时的反应(评分降低≥50%)。根据 DSM 标准,采用 DSM-IV 结构临床访谈和基线抑郁量表项目评估忧郁特征。

结果

基于项目的忧郁特征与治疗效果呈正相关,尽管逻辑回归模型中的亚组治疗相互作用未达到统计学意义。严重精神运动迟缓的小亚组患者似乎也受益于拉莫三嗪治疗。然而,DSM-IV 结构临床访谈的忧郁特征与更大的治疗效果没有关联。根据使用的量表定义严重程度,基线抑郁严重程度与反应不一致。尽管两种忧郁症变量的患病率相似,但它们之间的一致性较差。

结论

我们的结果并未明确支持最初的假设,但确实强调了对临床试验进行额外数据的二次分析的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df6/8083162/d7b8066e5d7e/jcp-41-315-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验