Test Sets and Real-Life Performance: Can One Predict the Other?
作者信息
Thigpen Denise, Rapelyea Jocelyn
机构信息
Department of Radiology, The George Washington University Medical Center, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20037.
出版信息
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2020 Sep 25;2(5):e200126. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2020200126. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Test Sets and Real-Life Performance: Can One Predict the Other?测试集与实际性能：二者能相互预测吗？
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2020 Sep 25;2(5):e200126. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2020200126. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
The relationship between missed breast cancers on mammography in a test-set based assessment scheme and real-life performance in a National Breast Screening Programme.基于检测集评估方案的乳腺 X 光摄影漏诊乳腺癌与全国性乳腺筛查计划中实际表现之间的关系。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Sep;142:109881. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109881. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
The Relationship between Mammography Readers' Real-Life Performance and Performance in a Test Set-based Assessment Scheme in a National Breast Screening Program.全国乳腺筛查计划中基于测试集评估方案的乳腺 X 线摄影读片者真实表现与测试表现之间的关系。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2020 Sep 25;2(5):e200016. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2020200016. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Artificial intelligence for the real world of breast screening.人工智能在乳腺筛查的实际应用。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Nov;144:109661. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109661. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
5
Correlation Between Screening Mammography Interpretive Performance on a Test Set and Performance in Clinical Practice.乳腺钼靶筛查对测试集的解读性能与临床实践中的性能之间的相关性。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Oct;24(10):1256-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 May 24.
6
Correlation of Test Sets and Actual Clinical Performance.测试集与实际临床性能的相关性。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021 Jan 29;3(1):e200139. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2021200139. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Breast cancer screening.
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1997 Sep-Dec;16(3-4):231-62. doi: 10.1023/a:1005893126451.
8
Association of Mammography Screening With a Reduction in Breast Cancer Mortality: A Modeling Study Using Population-Based Data From 2 French Departments.基于法国两个省的人口数据建立模型研究发现，乳腺 X 线筛查可降低乳腺癌死亡率
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 May 4;190(5):827-835. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa218.
9
The impact of adjunctive tomosynthesis on screening mammography outcomes in two widely diverse radiology practices.辅助断层合成摄影术对两家差异显著的放射科筛查性乳房 X 光摄影术结果的影响。
Breast J. 2021 Jan;27(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14121. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
10
New mammography screening performance metrics based on the entire screening episode.基于整个筛查过程的新型乳腺钼靶筛查性能指标。
Cancer. 2020 Jul 15;126(14):3289-3296. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32939. Epub 2020 May 6.
本文引用的文献
1
The Relationship between Mammography Readers' Real-Life Performance and Performance in a Test Set-based Assessment Scheme in a National Breast Screening Program.全国乳腺筛查计划中基于测试集评估方案的乳腺 X 线摄影读片者真实表现与测试表现之间的关系。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2020 Sep 25;2(5):e200016. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2020200016. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Trends in Attaining Mammography Quality Benchmarks With Repeated Participation in a Quality Measurement Program: Going Beyond the Mammography Quality Standards Act to Address Breast Cancer Disparities.通过重复参与质量测量项目实现乳腺X线摄影质量基准的趋势：超越《乳腺X线摄影质量标准法案》以解决乳腺癌差异问题。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov;17(11):1420-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
Strategies for Decreasing Screening Mammography Recall Rates While Maintaining Performance Metrics.
Acad Radiol. 2017 Dec;24(12):1556-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
4
National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.现代筛查数字化乳腺摄影的国家性能基准：来自乳腺癌监测联盟的更新
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):49-58. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161174. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
5
Certain performance values arising from mammographic test set readings correlate well with clinical audit.乳腺钼靶检查数据集读数产生的某些性能值与临床审计结果高度相关。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Aug;59(4):403-410. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12301. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.美国与英国乳腺钼靶筛查的比较。
JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2129-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2129.
Zotero 插件