• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无成功命名的累积语义成本。

Cumulative semantic cost without successful naming.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università di Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1348-1359. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01172-3. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-021-01172-3
PMID:33782859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8476367/
Abstract

Accessing semantic information has negative consequences for successive recovering attempts of similar information. For instance, in the course of picture-naming tasks, the time required to name an object is determined by the total number of items from the same category that have already been named; naming latencies increase proportionally to the total number of semantically related words named previously. This phenomenon is called cumulative semantic cost (or interference). Two picture-naming experiments with children (4-11 years old, 229 participants) investigate whether having successfully named the previous within-category items is a necessary condition for the cumulative semantic cost to appear. We anticipated that younger children would have a larger rate of nonresponses compared with older children, reflecting the fact that younger children have not yet consolidated many lexical representations. Our results confirmed this prediction. Critically, we also observed that cumulative semantic cost was independent of having successfully retrieved previous within-category lexical items. Furthermore, picture trials for which the previous within-category item elicited a nonresponse showed the same amount of cost as those picture trials for which the previous within-category item elicited a correct naming event. Our findings indicate that it is the attempt to retrieve a lexical unit, and not the successful retrieval of a specific lexical unit, that causes semantic cost in picture naming. This cost can be explained by a mechanism of weakening the semantic-to-lexical mappings of semantic coordinate words. The findings are also discussed in the context of retrieval-induced forgetting effects in memory recall research.

摘要

获取语义信息会对相似信息的后续恢复尝试产生负面影响。例如,在图片命名任务中,命名一个物体所需的时间取决于已经命名的同一类别中的物品总数;命名延迟与之前命名的所有语义相关单词的总数成正比增加。这种现象被称为累积语义成本(或干扰)。两个针对儿童(4-11 岁,229 名参与者)的图片命名实验调查了成功命名之前的类别内项目是否是累积语义成本出现的必要条件。我们预计,与年龄较大的儿童相比,年幼的儿童会有更高的无反应率,这反映了年幼的儿童尚未巩固许多词汇代表的事实。我们的结果证实了这一预测。至关重要的是,我们还观察到,累积语义成本与成功检索先前类别内的词汇项目无关。此外,对于先前类别内的项目引起无反应的图片试验与那些先前类别内的项目引起正确命名事件的图片试验具有相同的成本。我们的发现表明,导致图片命名中语义成本的是检索词汇单元的尝试,而不是特定词汇单元的成功检索。这种成本可以通过一种削弱语义坐标词的语义到词汇映射的机制来解释。研究结果还在记忆召回研究中的检索诱导遗忘效应的背景下进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/435a/8476367/5afd4a129fda/13421_2021_1172_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/435a/8476367/6d49efd685b2/13421_2021_1172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/435a/8476367/5afd4a129fda/13421_2021_1172_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/435a/8476367/6d49efd685b2/13421_2021_1172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/435a/8476367/5afd4a129fda/13421_2021_1172_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cumulative semantic cost without successful naming.无成功命名的累积语义成本。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1348-1359. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01172-3. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
With or without semantic mediation: retrieval of lexical representations in sign production.有无语义中介:手语产生中词汇表征的提取
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Apr;20(2):163-71. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enu045. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
3
The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition.累积语义成本并不反映竞争导致的词汇选择。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
4
Word naming slows picture naming but does not affect cumulative semantic interference.单词命名会减慢图片命名的速度,但不影响累积语义干扰。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Apr;195:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
5
Concurrent semantic priming and lexical interference for close semantic relations in blocked-cyclic picture naming: Electrophysiological signatures.在分块循环图片命名中,针对近义语义关系的并发语义启动和词汇干扰:电生理特征。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Apr;59(4):e13990. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13990. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
6
Cumulative semantic interference across unrelated responses in school-age children's picture naming.学龄儿童图片命名中跨不相关反应的累积语义干扰。
J Child Lang. 2021 May;48(3):499-514. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000422. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
7
Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.物体命名中的语义语境和视觉特征效应:一项使用动脉自旋标记的功能磁共振成像研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1571-83. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21114.
8
Semantic interference in a randomized naming task: effects of age, order, and category.随机命名任务中的语义干扰:年龄、顺序和类别效应。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(7-8):476-94. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.877437. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
9
Facilitation and interference in naming: A consequence of the same learning process?命名中的促进与干扰:同一学习过程的结果?
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Different Loci of Semantic Interference in Picture Naming vs. Word-Picture Matching Tasks.图片命名与词图匹配任务中语义干扰的不同位点。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 13;7:710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00710. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Cumulative semantic interference is blind to morphological complexity and originates at the conceptual level.累积语义干扰对形态复杂性是盲目的,并且起源于概念层面。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0268915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268915. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Cumulative semantic interference across unrelated responses in school-age children's picture naming.学龄儿童图片命名中跨不相关反应的累积语义干扰。
J Child Lang. 2021 May;48(3):499-514. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000422. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Examining the influence of picture format on children's naming responses.考察图片格式对儿童命名反应的影响。
PeerJ. 2019 Oct 2;7:e7692. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7692. eCollection 2019.
3
Semantic interference in speech error production in a randomized continuous naming task: Evidence from aphasia.
随机连续命名任务中言语错误产生的语义干扰:来自失语症的证据。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019;34(1):69-86. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1501500. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
A unified computational account of cumulative semantic, semantic blocking, and semantic distractor effects in picture naming.在图片命名中,对累积语义、语义阻断和语义干扰效应进行统一的计算解释。
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
Nature and origins of the lexicon in 6-mo-olds.6 个月大婴儿词汇的本质和起源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 5;114(49):12916-12921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712966114. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
Linking language and categorization in infancy.婴儿期语言与分类的联系。
J Child Lang. 2017 May;44(3):527-552. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000568. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
What can Written-Words Tell us About Lexical Retrieval in Speech Production?书面文字能告诉我们关于言语产生中的词汇检索的哪些信息?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 6;6:1982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01982. eCollection 2015.
8
Specifying the role of the left prefrontal cortex in word selection.明确左前额叶皮质在单词选择中的作用。
Brain Lang. 2015 Oct;149:135-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
9
Predicting vocabulary growth in children with and without specific language impairment: a longitudinal study from 2;6 to 21 years of age.预测有和没有特定语言障碍的儿童的词汇增长:一项从2岁6个月至21岁的纵向研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Apr;58(2):345-59. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0150.
10
With or without semantic mediation: retrieval of lexical representations in sign production.有无语义中介:手语产生中词汇表征的提取
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Apr;20(2):163-71. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enu045. Epub 2015 Jan 1.