Suppr超能文献

随机命名任务中的语义干扰:年龄、顺序和类别效应。

Semantic interference in a randomized naming task: effects of age, order, and category.

机构信息

a Communication Sciences & Disorders , University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(7-8):476-94. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.877437. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

Abstract

Lexical retrieval in production is a competitive process, requiring activation of a target word from semantic input and its selection from amongst coactivated items. Competitors are automatically primed through spreading activation within the lexicon, but competition may be increased by the prior presentation of related items: the semantic interference effect. This has been demonstrated in tasks in which pictures grouped by semantic category are compared to unrelated pictures (blocked naming) and in tasks involving successive naming of items from the same semantic category (continuous naming). Such highly structured tasks may not be representative of the processes at work under more natural word retrieval conditions. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective examination of naming latencies from a randomized picture naming task containing a wide variety of items and categories. Our large sample of adults, ranging in age from 22 to 89 years, also allowed us to test the hypothesis that older adults, who are particularly susceptible to word-retrieval problems, experience increased difficulty resolving competition among lexical items. Semantic interference effects were evident in the interaction between semantic category and order of presentation within a block-miscellaneous items were named more quickly, whereas related items were named more slowly. This interference effect did not vary with participant age, contrary to the hypothesis that older adults are more susceptible to semantic interference.

摘要

生成过程中的词汇提取是一个竞争过程,需要从语义输入中激活目标词,并从共同激活的项目中选择目标词。通过词汇内的扩散激活,自动启动竞争者,但通过先呈现相关项目,可以增加竞争:语义干扰效应。这在通过语义类别分组的图片与不相关图片进行比较的任务中(阻断命名)和涉及从同一语义类别连续命名项目的任务中(连续命名)得到了证明。这种高度结构化的任务可能无法代表在更自然的单词检索条件下的工作过程。因此,我们对包含各种项目和类别的随机图片命名任务中的命名潜伏期进行了回顾性检查。我们的成年人样本很大,年龄从 22 岁到 89 岁不等,这也使我们能够检验这样一个假设,即特别容易出现单词检索问题的老年人在解决词汇项目之间的竞争时会遇到更大的困难。在一个块内的语义类别和呈现顺序之间的交互中,语义干扰效应明显——杂项项目命名速度更快,而相关项目命名速度较慢。与假设相反,老年人更容易受到语义干扰的影响,这种干扰效应与参与者的年龄无关。

相似文献

2
Cumulative semantic cost without successful naming.无成功命名的累积语义成本。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1348-1359. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01172-3. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?延迟命名是否存在语义干扰?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):522-38. doi: 10.1037/a0021970.

引用本文的文献

3
Neural sensitivity to semantic neighbors is stable across the adult lifespan.成人的一生中,对语义邻居的神经敏感性是稳定的。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jul 4;171:108237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108237. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
8
Specifying the role of the left prefrontal cortex in word selection.明确左前额叶皮质在单词选择中的作用。
Brain Lang. 2015 Oct;149:135-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The Aging Neighborhood: Phonological Density in Naming.老龄化社区:命名中的语音密度
Lang Cogn Process. 2014 Jan 1;29(3):326-344. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.837495.
4
A new multiword naming deficit: Evidence and interpretation.一种新的多词命名缺陷:证据与解释。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 May 1;19(3):263-88. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000187.
7
The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition.累积语义成本并不反映竞争导致的词汇选择。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验