• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Semantic interference in a randomized naming task: effects of age, order, and category.随机命名任务中的语义干扰:年龄、顺序和类别效应。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(7-8):476-94. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.877437. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
2
Cumulative semantic cost without successful naming.无成功命名的累积语义成本。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct;49(7):1348-1359. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01172-3. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
When comprehension elicits incomprehension: Deterioration of semantic categorisation in the absence of stimulus repetition.当理解引发不理解时:在无刺激重复情况下语义分类的退化。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Sep;71(9):1817-1843. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1363793. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
Lexical Retrieval is not by Competition: Evidence from the Blocked Naming Paradigm.词汇检索并非通过竞争:来自受阻命名范式的证据。
J Mem Lang. 2014 Oct;76:253-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.003.
5
My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.天哪!阅读物体名称产生的干扰意味着在图片命名检索过程中存在竞争作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1229-40. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.655699. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
6
Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis.延迟命名任务中的语义干扰:反应排除假说的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):249-56. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249.
7
Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?延迟命名是否存在语义干扰?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):522-38. doi: 10.1037/a0021970.
8
Concurrent semantic priming and lexical interference for close semantic relations in blocked-cyclic picture naming: Electrophysiological signatures.在分块循环图片命名中,针对近义语义关系的并发语义启动和词汇干扰:电生理特征。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Apr;59(4):e13990. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13990. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
9
What can Written-Words Tell us About Lexical Retrieval in Speech Production?书面文字能告诉我们关于言语产生中的词汇检索的哪些信息?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 6;6:1982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01982. eCollection 2015.
10
Semantic interference is not modality specific: Evidence from sound naming with distractor pictures.语义干扰不具有模态特异性:来自带有干扰图片的声音命名的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Dec;73(12):2290-2308. doi: 10.1177/1747021820943130. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of older adults on MTL- BR Battery: ARE There differences in healthy aging? A pilot study.老年人在MTL - BR电池测试中的表现:健康衰老存在差异吗?一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 11;20(8):e0329675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329675. eCollection 2025.
2
Are Faster Participants Always Faster? Assessing Reliability of Participants' Mean Response Speed in Picture Naming.速度较快的参与者总是更快吗?评估图片命名中参与者平均反应速度的可靠性。
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 11;7(1):12. doi: 10.5334/joc.337. eCollection 2024.
3
Neural sensitivity to semantic neighbors is stable across the adult lifespan.成人的一生中,对语义邻居的神经敏感性是稳定的。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jul 4;171:108237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108237. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
4
Semantic interference in speech error production in a randomized continuous naming task: Evidence from aphasia.随机连续命名任务中言语错误产生的语义干扰:来自失语症的证据。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019;34(1):69-86. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1501500. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
5
Why is Lexical Retrieval Slower for Bilinguals? Evidence from Picture Naming.为什么双语者的词汇检索速度较慢?来自图片命名的证据。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2018 May;21(3):479-488. doi: 10.1017/S1366728917000694. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
6
The modulating effect of education on semantic interference during healthy aging.教育对健康衰老过程中语义干扰的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0191656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191656. eCollection 2018.
7
Distinct Effects of Lexical and Semantic Competition during Picture Naming in Younger Adults, Older Adults, and People with Aphasia.词汇和语义竞争在年轻人、老年人及失语症患者图片命名过程中的不同影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 2;7:813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00813. eCollection 2016.
8
Specifying the role of the left prefrontal cortex in word selection.明确左前额叶皮质在单词选择中的作用。
Brain Lang. 2015 Oct;149:135-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The Aging Neighborhood: Phonological Density in Naming.老龄化社区:命名中的语音密度
Lang Cogn Process. 2014 Jan 1;29(3):326-344. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.837495.
2
Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context.物体命名中的累积性和非累积性语义干扰:来自语义语境的分块式和连续性操作的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(11):2135-60. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.775318. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
3
Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production.近义语义联想和远义语义联想对词语生成的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar;11(1):32-43. doi: 10.3758/s13415-010-0009-7.
4
A new multiword naming deficit: Evidence and interpretation.一种新的多词命名缺陷:证据与解释。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 May 1;19(3):263-88. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000187.
5
Evidence for a context-sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia.非流畅性失语症病例中语境敏感的单词检索障碍的证据。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 Mar 1;19(2):165-86. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000169.
6
The rise and fall of word retrieval across the lifespan.词汇提取在整个生命周期中的兴衰。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Sep;25(3):719-24. doi: 10.1037/a0018927.
7
The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition.累积语义成本并不反映竞争导致的词汇选择。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
8
On the origin of the "cumulative semantic inhibition" effect.关于“累积语义抑制”效应的起源。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):57-66. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.57.
9
The dark side of incremental learning: a model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production.增量学习的阴暗面:言语产生中词汇通达过程中累积语义干扰的模型。
Cognition. 2010 Feb;114(2):227-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
10
Temporal characteristics of semantic perseverations induced by blocked-cyclic picture naming.分组循环图片命名诱发语义 perseverations 的时间特征
Brain Lang. 2009 Mar;108(3):133-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.11.003. Epub 2009 Jan 12.

随机命名任务中的语义干扰:年龄、顺序和类别效应。

Semantic interference in a randomized naming task: effects of age, order, and category.

机构信息

a Communication Sciences & Disorders , University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(7-8):476-94. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.877437. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1080/02643294.2013.877437
PMID:24499271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3965586/
Abstract

Lexical retrieval in production is a competitive process, requiring activation of a target word from semantic input and its selection from amongst coactivated items. Competitors are automatically primed through spreading activation within the lexicon, but competition may be increased by the prior presentation of related items: the semantic interference effect. This has been demonstrated in tasks in which pictures grouped by semantic category are compared to unrelated pictures (blocked naming) and in tasks involving successive naming of items from the same semantic category (continuous naming). Such highly structured tasks may not be representative of the processes at work under more natural word retrieval conditions. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective examination of naming latencies from a randomized picture naming task containing a wide variety of items and categories. Our large sample of adults, ranging in age from 22 to 89 years, also allowed us to test the hypothesis that older adults, who are particularly susceptible to word-retrieval problems, experience increased difficulty resolving competition among lexical items. Semantic interference effects were evident in the interaction between semantic category and order of presentation within a block-miscellaneous items were named more quickly, whereas related items were named more slowly. This interference effect did not vary with participant age, contrary to the hypothesis that older adults are more susceptible to semantic interference.

摘要

生成过程中的词汇提取是一个竞争过程,需要从语义输入中激活目标词,并从共同激活的项目中选择目标词。通过词汇内的扩散激活,自动启动竞争者,但通过先呈现相关项目,可以增加竞争:语义干扰效应。这在通过语义类别分组的图片与不相关图片进行比较的任务中(阻断命名)和涉及从同一语义类别连续命名项目的任务中(连续命名)得到了证明。这种高度结构化的任务可能无法代表在更自然的单词检索条件下的工作过程。因此,我们对包含各种项目和类别的随机图片命名任务中的命名潜伏期进行了回顾性检查。我们的成年人样本很大,年龄从 22 岁到 89 岁不等,这也使我们能够检验这样一个假设,即特别容易出现单词检索问题的老年人在解决词汇项目之间的竞争时会遇到更大的困难。在一个块内的语义类别和呈现顺序之间的交互中,语义干扰效应明显——杂项项目命名速度更快,而相关项目命名速度较慢。与假设相反,老年人更容易受到语义干扰的影响,这种干扰效应与参与者的年龄无关。