Suppr超能文献

图片命名与词图匹配任务中语义干扰的不同位点。

Different Loci of Semantic Interference in Picture Naming vs. Word-Picture Matching Tasks.

作者信息

Harvey Denise Y, Schnur Tatiana T

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PA, USA; Moss Rehabilitation Research InstituteElkins Park, PA, USA.

Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 May 13;7:710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00710. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Naming pictures and matching words to pictures belonging to the same semantic category impairs performance relative to when stimuli come from different semantic categories (i.e., semantic interference). Despite similar semantic interference phenomena in both picture naming and word-picture matching tasks, the locus of interference has been attributed to different levels of the language system - lexical in naming and semantic in word-picture matching. Although both tasks involve access to shared semantic representations, the extent to which interference originates and/or has its locus at a shared level remains unclear, as these effects are often investigated in isolation. We manipulated semantic context in cyclical picture naming and word-picture matching tasks, and tested whether factors tapping semantic-level (generalization of interference to novel category items) and lexical-level processes (interactions with lexical frequency) affected the magnitude of interference, while also assessing whether interference occurs at a shared processing level(s) (transfer of interference across tasks). We found that semantic interference in naming was sensitive to both semantic- and lexical-level processes (i.e., larger interference for novel vs. old and low- vs. high-frequency stimuli), consistent with a semantically mediated lexical locus. Interference in word-picture matching exhibited stable interference for old and novel stimuli and did not interact with lexical frequency. Further, interference transferred from word-picture matching to naming. Together, these experiments provide evidence to suggest that semantic interference in both tasks originates at a shared processing stage (presumably at the semantic level), but that it exerts its effect at different loci when naming pictures vs. matching words to pictures.

摘要

与刺激来自不同语义类别时相比,命名图片以及将单词与属于同一语义类别的图片进行匹配会损害表现(即语义干扰)。尽管在图片命名和单词 - 图片匹配任务中存在相似的语义干扰现象,但干扰的位置却归因于语言系统的不同层次——命名中的词汇层次和单词 - 图片匹配中的语义层次。虽然这两个任务都涉及对共享语义表征的访问,但干扰在多大程度上起源于和/或其位置在共享层次仍不清楚,因为这些效应通常是单独研究的。我们在循环图片命名和单词 - 图片匹配任务中操纵语义语境,并测试了挖掘语义层次(干扰对新类别项目的泛化)和词汇层次过程(与词汇频率的相互作用)的因素是否会影响干扰的程度,同时还评估了干扰是否发生在共享处理层次(跨任务的干扰转移)。我们发现命名中的语义干扰对语义和词汇层次过程都敏感(即对新刺激与旧刺激以及低频刺激与高频刺激的干扰更大),这与语义介导的词汇位置一致。单词 - 图片匹配中的干扰对旧刺激和新刺激表现出稳定的干扰,并且与词汇频率没有相互作用。此外,干扰从单词 - 图片匹配转移到了命名。总之,这些实验提供了证据表明,两个任务中的语义干扰都起源于共享处理阶段(大概在语义层次),但在命名图片与将单词与图片匹配时,它在不同的位置发挥作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac4/4865493/4f53ecf69982/fpsyg-07-00710-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验