Effectiveness of a venous thromboembolism course using flipped classroom with nursing students: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND

Modern innovative education approaches are crucial for nursing education, which leads to improving evidence-based teaching strategies and preparing nursing students for their future workplaces. The primary aim of the study was a comparison of the effectiveness of the flipped classroom and traditional educational methods on the attainment of knowledge regarding venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention among nursing students. In addition, investigation of the opinions of the nursing students regarding the advantages and disadvantages flipped classroom educational method was the secondary aim of the study.

METHODS

This study was implemented with a randomized controlled design in the Faculty of Nursing in September and October 2019, with 118 first- and second-semester undergraduate nursing students (58 students in the flipped classroom, 60 students in the traditional lecture) who had not taken the Adult Health Nursing course. Implementation of the study was conducted in three phases: pretest, educational intervention, and posttest for both groups.

RESULTS

The study findings demonstrated no statistically significant difference in any of the mean scores of VTE domains between the two groups in the pretest. However, the flipped classroom group had higher mean scores of all VTE domains compared with the traditional lecture group in the posttest. Mostly, students highlighted four advantages of the flipped classroom, including "Deep motive," "Engagement," "Cost-effectiveness," and "Self-confidence."

CONCLUSIONS

The flipped classroom method proved to have positive effects in VTE domains in terms of knowledge, risk assessment, and prophylaxis among nursing students. This method can be recommended as an innovative and student-centered method in the teaching of evidence-based nursing practices.