Souza Anelise Andrade de, Mingoti Sueli Aparecida, Paes-Sousa Rômulo, Heller Léo
Instituto René Rachou, Fiocruz Minas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Department of Statistics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 30;16(3):e0248676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248676. eCollection 2021.
Governmental measures aiming at social protection, with components of disease control, have potential positive impacts in the nutritional and health outcomes of the beneficiaries. The concomitant presence of these measures with environmental sanitation interventions may increase their positive effect. The context of simultaneous improvement of social protection and environmental sanitation is found in Brazil since 2007 and an assessment of the combined effects of both programs has not been performed so far.
To evaluate whether interaction effects between improvement of access to water, sanitation and solid waste collection with the Bolsa Família Program [PBF] were related to better responses in the reduction of morbidity due to diarrhea and malnutrition in children less than five years of age, acknowledging the positive results of these improved conditions and the PBF separately in coping with these diseases.
Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed through Generalized Linear Models of the Negative Binomial type of fixed effects, with and without addition of zeros. Interaction models were inserted in order to evaluate the outcomes when the two public policies of interest in the current study were present simultaneously in the municipalities.
Interaction with negative effect when a concomitantly high municipal coverage of the Bolsa Família Program and adequate access to sanitation and solid waste collection were present. In contrast, regardless of municipal coverage by the PBF, the simultaneous presence of water and sanitation (0.028% / 0.019%); water and solid waste collection (0.033% / 0.014%); sanitation and solid waste collection (0.018% / 0.021%), all resulted in a positive effect, with a decrease in the average morbidity rates for both diseases.
Investments aimed at universalizing water, sanitation and solid waste collection services should be priorities, aiming at reducing the incidence of morbidity due to malnutrition and diarrhea and preventing deaths from these poverty-related diseases.
旨在进行社会保护并包含疾病控制内容的政府措施,对受益者的营养和健康状况可能产生积极影响。这些措施与环境卫生干预措施同时实施,可能会增强其积极效果。自2007年以来,巴西存在社会保护和环境卫生同时改善的情况,而目前尚未对这两个项目的综合效果进行评估。
鉴于改善获得水、卫生设施和固体废弃物收集服务以及巴西家庭补助金计划(PBF)各自在应对这些疾病方面取得的积极成果,评估改善获得水、卫生设施和固体废弃物收集服务与巴西家庭补助金计划(PBF)之间的相互作用效应是否与五岁以下儿童腹泻和营养不良发病率的更好降低反应相关。
通过负二项式固定效应广义线性模型进行描述性和推断性分析,包括添加零值和不添加零值的情况。插入相互作用模型以评估本研究中两项相关公共政策在各市同时存在时的结果。
当巴西家庭补助金计划在各市的覆盖率较高且同时具备充足的卫生设施和固体废弃物收集服务时,存在负向相互作用效应。相比之下,无论巴西家庭补助金计划在各市的覆盖率如何,水和卫生设施同时存在(0.028% / 0.019%);水和固体废弃物收集同时存在(0.033% / 0.014%);卫生设施和固体废弃物收集同时存在(0.018% / 0.021%),均产生了积极效应,两种疾病的平均发病率均有所下降。
旨在普及水、卫生设施和固体废弃物收集服务的投资应成为优先事项,以降低营养不良和腹泻导致的发病率,并预防这些与贫困相关疾病造成的死亡。