Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology Boston University School of Medicine Boston MA.
Department of Health Sciences Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesBoston University Boston MA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e019800. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019800. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
Background The conjoint associations of adherence to the recent physical activity and dietary guidelines with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) are incompletely understood. Methods and Results We evaluated 2379 FHS (Framingham Heart Study) Third Generation participants (mean age, 47 years; 54.4% women) attending examination cycle 2. We examined the cross-sectional relations of adherence to the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (binary; moderate-to-vigorous physical activity ≥150 versus <150 min/wk) and 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (binary; 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans Adherence Index ≥median versus <median [score, 62.1/100]) with prevalence of the MetS using generalized linear models. We also related adherence to guidelines with the incidence of MetS prospectively, using Cox proportional hazards regression with discrete time intervals. Adherence rates to the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.60) and 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90) were individually associated with lower odds of prevalent MetS, whereas conjoint adherence to both guidelines was associated with the lowest odds of MetS (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.26-0.47) compared with the referent group (nonadherence to both guidelines). Adherence rates to the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.88) and 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90) were associated with lower risk of MetS, prospectively. In addition, we observed a 52% lower risk of MetS in individuals who adhered to both guidelines compared with the referent group. Conclusions Maintaining both regular physical activity and a healthy diet in midlife may be required for optimal cardiometabolic health in later life.
目前,人们对坚持近期的身体活动和饮食指南与代谢综合征(MetS)之间的联合关联还了解甚少。
我们评估了参加弗雷明汉心脏研究第三代(FHS)第 2 次检查周期的 2379 名参与者(平均年龄 47 岁,54.4%为女性)。我们使用广义线性模型检验了坚持 2018 年《美国身体活动指南》(二分法;中高强度体力活动≥150 分钟/周与<150 分钟/周)和 2015 年《美国饮食指南》(二分法;2015 年《美国饮食指南依从性指数》≥中位数与<中位数[评分,62.1/100])与 MetS 患病率之间的横断面关系。我们还使用离散时间间隔的 Cox 比例风险回归,前瞻性地将对指南的依从性与 MetS 的发生相关联。对 2018 年《美国身体活动指南》(比值比[OR],0.49;95%CI,0.40-0.60)和 2015 年《美国饮食指南》(OR,0.67;95%CI,0.51-0.90)的依从率与较低的 MetS 发病几率独立相关,而同时坚持这两项指南与最低的 MetS 发病几率相关(OR,0.35;95%CI,0.26-0.47),与参考组(两项指南均不坚持)相比。对 2018 年《美国身体活动指南》(HR,0.66;95%CI,0.50-0.88)和 2015 年《美国饮食指南》(HR,0.68;95%CI,0.51-0.90)的依从率与 MetS 的风险降低相关,具有前瞻性。此外,与参考组相比,坚持这两项指南的个体患 MetS 的风险降低了 52%。
在中年时期保持定期的身体活动和健康饮食可能是晚年实现最佳心脏代谢健康所必需的。