Beloborodov Vladimir, Vorobev Vladimir, Kalyagin Alexey, Seminskiy Igor, Sharakshinov Bator, Popov Sergei, Baklanova Olga
Department of General Surgery and Anesthesiology/Academic Council, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Department of Urology, GBUZ State Oncology Hospital, Irkutsk, Russia.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Mar;16(1):151-162. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.94281. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
There are several options for vessel-sparing anastomotic procedures that allow one to avoid disturbances in the normal blood supply to the spongy body and successfully perform plastic surgery of distal urethral strictures.
To perform a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of reconstructive surgical treatment of strictures of the bulbo-membranous urethra with anastomotic surgery with and without vessel-sparing.
A prospective study was carried out on 28 patients with a diagnosis of stricture of the bulbo-membranous urethra who underwent treatment in the period 2012-2018 in the conditions of a urological hospital of Irkutsk City Clinical Hospital No. 1. Anastomotic urethroplasty was performed using one of two methods: with full mobilization of the spongy body bulb and a vessel-sparing method when the spongy body does not intersect.
The effectiveness of the classical method of anastomosing EPA-TWW ((excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty (Turner-Warwick) and excision and Jordan's technique of vessel sparing excision and primary anastomosis)) was comparable with the method of anastomosing without crossing the (spongy body of EPA-J). Postoperative changes in the parameters of the functional status of patients based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function, and Quality of Life were comparable in patients undergoing EPA-TWW and EPA-J. The final data indicate a statistically equivalent risk of developing complications such as urinary incontinence, shortening of the penis, and decreased erectile function.
The study did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of the treatment and the risks of complications during anastomotic surgery with or without vessel-sparing. However, an unformalized assessment demonstrates the best state of erectile function in patients after vascular-preserving surgery.
有几种保留血管的吻合手术方法可供选择,这些方法能避免海绵体正常血液供应受到干扰,并成功实施远端尿道狭窄的整形手术。
对保留血管和不保留血管的吻合手术治疗球膜部尿道狭窄的重建手术效果进行比较分析。
对2012年至2018年期间在伊尔库茨克市第一临床医院泌尿外科接受治疗的28例诊断为球膜部尿道狭窄的患者进行了前瞻性研究。吻合尿道成形术采用两种方法之一:一种是完全游离海绵体球部,另一种是保留血管的方法,即海绵体不交叉。
经典的EPA-TWW吻合方法(切除并一期吻合尿道成形术(特纳-沃里克法)以及切除并采用乔丹保留血管切除和一期吻合技术)的效果与不穿过(EPA-J的海绵体)的吻合方法相当。基于国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、国际勃起功能指数和生活质量的患者功能状态参数的术后变化,在接受EPA-TWW和EPA-J治疗的患者中具有可比性。最终数据表明,尿失禁、阴茎缩短和勃起功能下降等并发症发生的统计学风险相当。
该研究未显示保留血管或不保留血管的吻合手术在治疗效果和并发症风险方面存在统计学上的显著差异。然而,一项未正式化的评估表明,保留血管手术后患者的勃起功能状态最佳。