Troy Karen L, Mancuso Megan E, Johnson Joshua E, Butler Tiffiny A, Ngo Bao Han, Schnitzer Thomas J
Department of Biomedical Engienering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States of America.
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
Bone Rep. 2021 Mar 13;14:101012. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101012. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Most information about distal radius microstructure is based on the non-dominant forearm, with little known about the factors that contribute to bilateral asymmetries in the general population, or what factors may influence bilateral changes over time. Here, we analyzed bilateral high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) data collected over a 12-month period as part of a clinical trial that prescribed a well-controlled, compressive loading task to the nondominant forearm. Baseline data from 102 women age 21-40, and longitudinal data from 66 women who completed the 12-month trial, were examined to determine factors responsible for side-to-side asymmetries in bone structure and change in structure over time. Cross-sectionally, the dominant radius had 2.4%-2.7% larger cross-sectional area, trabecular area, and bone mineral content than the nondominant radius, but no other differences were noted. Those who more strongly favored their dominant arm had significantly more, thinner, closely spaced trabecular struts in their dominant versus nondominant radius. Individuals assigned to a loading intervention had significant bilateral gains in total bone mineral density (2.0% and 1.2% in the nondominant versus dominant sides), and unilateral gains in the nondominant (loaded) cortical area (3.1%), thickness (3.0%), bone mineral density (1.7%) and inner trabecular density (1.3%). Each of these gains were significantly predicted by loading dose, a metric that included bone strain, number of cycles, and strain rate. Within individuals, change was negatively associated with age, meaning that women closer to age 40 experienced less of a gain in bone versus those closer to age 21. We believe that dominant/nondominant asymmetries in bone structure reflect differences in habitual loads during growth and past ability to adapt, while response to loading reflects current individual physiologic capacity to adapt.
大多数关于桡骨远端微观结构的信息都基于非优势前臂,对于导致普通人群双侧不对称的因素,或者哪些因素可能影响随时间的双侧变化,人们了解甚少。在此,我们分析了在一项为期12个月的临床试验中收集的双侧高分辨率外周定量计算机断层扫描(HRpQCT)数据,该试验对非优势前臂规定了一项控制良好的压缩负荷任务。对102名年龄在21 - 40岁女性的基线数据,以及66名完成了为期12个月试验的女性的纵向数据进行了检查,以确定导致骨结构左右不对称以及随时间结构变化的因素。横断面分析显示,优势桡骨的横截面积、小梁面积和骨矿物质含量比非优势桡骨大2.4% - 2.7%,但未发现其他差异。那些更倾向于使用优势手臂的人,其优势桡骨与非优势桡骨相比,小梁支柱明显更多、更细且间距更近。接受负荷干预的个体,其双侧总骨矿物质密度有显著增加(非优势侧增加2.0%,优势侧增加1.2%),非优势(负荷)皮质面积、厚度、骨矿物质密度和内小梁密度有单侧增加(分别为3.1%、3.0%、1.7%和1.3%)。这些增加均由负荷剂量显著预测,负荷剂量是一个包括骨应变、循环次数和应变率的指标。在个体内部,变化与年龄呈负相关,这意味着接近40岁的女性与接近21岁的女性相比,骨量增加较少。我们认为,骨结构的优势/非优势不对称反映了生长过程中习惯性负荷的差异以及过去的适应能力,而对负荷的反应则反映了当前个体的生理适应能力。