• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危机怀孕中心的真相与透明度。

Truth and Transparency in Crisis Pregnancy Centers.

作者信息

Polcyn Carly, Swiezy Sarah, Genn Leah, Wickramage Pavithra, Sidiqqui Neha, Johnson Candise, Nair Pooja, Bernard Caitlin, Miller Velvet

机构信息

University of Toledo-Health Science Campus, Toledo, Ohio, USA.

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Jul 27;1(1):224-226. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0057. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1089/whr.2020.0057
PMID:33786483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7784822/
Abstract

The prevalence of crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs), their false claims, and the real harm they cause necessitate public education about their unethical practices. Also called "pregnancy resource centers" and "pregnancy support centers," CPCs are nonmedical institutions designed to deceive women seeking comprehensive pregnancy care, as their volunteers are instructed to pedal misinformation about reproductive health care.

摘要

危机怀孕中心(CPCs)的盛行、它们的虚假宣传以及所造成的实际危害,使得有必要对公众开展关于其不道德行为的教育。CPCs也被称为“怀孕资源中心”和“怀孕支持中心”,它们是非医疗机构,旨在欺骗寻求全面怀孕护理的女性,因为其志愿者被指示传播有关生殖保健的错误信息。

相似文献

1
Truth and Transparency in Crisis Pregnancy Centers.危机怀孕中心的真相与透明度。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Jul 27;1(1):224-226. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0057. eCollection 2020.
2
Crisis Pregnancy Centers in the United States: Lack of Adherence to Medical and Ethical Practice Standards; A Joint Position Statement of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology.美国的危机怀孕中心:未遵守医学和道德实践标准;青少年健康与医学协会及北美儿科与青少年妇科协会的联合立场声明
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Dec;32(6):563-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
3
Crisis Pregnancy Centers in the U.S.: Lack of Adherence to Medical and Ethical Practice Standards: A Joint Position Statement of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology.美国危机妊娠中心:不遵守医疗和伦理实践标准:青少年健康与医学学会和北美儿科与青少年妇科协会的联合立场声明。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Dec;65(6):821-824. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
A Web-Based Geolocated Directory of Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs) in the United States: Description of CPC Map Methods and Design Features and Analysis of Baseline Data.一个基于网络的美国危机怀孕中心(CPC)地理位置目录:CPC 地图方法和设计特点的描述以及基线数据的分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Mar 27;6(1):e16726. doi: 10.2196/16726.
5
The Problems with Crisis Pregnancy Centers: Reviewing the Literature and Identifying New Directions for Future Research.危机怀孕中心的问题:文献综述与未来研究新方向的确定
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Jun 8;14:757-763. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S288861. eCollection 2022.
6
Patient Experiences at California Crisis Pregnancy Centers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Online Crowd-Sourced Reviews, 2010-2019.加州危机怀孕中心的患者体验:2010-2019 年在线众包评论的混合方法分析。
South Med J. 2022 Feb;115(2):144-151. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001353.
7
Crisis pregnancy center websites: Information, misinformation and disinformation.危机怀孕中心网站:信息、错误信息与虚假信息。
Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
8
Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州危机妊娠中心的堕胎错误信息。
Contraception. 2012 Dec;86(6):752-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
9
Why Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Legal but Unethical.为何危机怀孕中心合法却不道德。
AMA J Ethics. 2018 Mar 1;20(1):269-277. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.pfor1-1803.
10
"Gummy Bears" and "Teddy Grahams": Ultrasounds as religious biopower in Crisis Pregnancy Centers.“小熊软糖”和“泰德格拉汉姆”:危机怀孕中心的超声作为宗教生物权力。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113925. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113925. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Personhood Begins at Birth: The Rational Foundation for Abortion Policy in a Secular State.人格始于出生:世俗国家堕胎政策的理性基础。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):751-769. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10352-0. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Crisis Pregnancy Centers in the United States: Lack of Adherence to Medical and Ethical Practice Standards; A Joint Position Statement of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology.美国的危机怀孕中心:未遵守医学和道德实践标准;青少年健康与医学协会及北美儿科与青少年妇科协会的联合立场声明
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Dec;32(6):563-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
2
The prevalence and impacts of crisis pregnancy center visits among a population of pregnant women.孕期女性中危机妊娠中心就诊的流行率及其影响。
Contraception. 2018 Jul;98(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
Sexual and Reproductive Health Services and Related Health Information on Pregnancy Resource Center Websites: A Statewide Content Analysis.妊娠资源中心网站上的性与生殖健康服务和相关健康信息:全州范围内容分析。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jan-Feb;28(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
Crisis pregnancy center websites: Information, misinformation and disinformation.危机怀孕中心网站:信息、错误信息与虚假信息。
Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
5
Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州危机妊娠中心的堕胎错误信息。
Contraception. 2012 Dec;86(6):752-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 6.