Young Claire Louise, Mohebbi Mohammadreza, Staudacher Heidi M, Kay-Lambkin Frances, Berk Michael, Jacka Felice Nellie, O'Neil Adrienne
Food & Mood Centre, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Mar 31;8(3):e24871. doi: 10.2196/24871.
Online interventions can be a cost-effective and efficient way to deliver programs to large numbers of people regardless of geographic location. However, attrition in web-based interventions is often an issue. Developing ways to keep participants engaged is important for ensuring validity and limiting potential biases. We developed a web-based dietary intervention as part of The My Food & Mood study which aimed to optimize ways to engage participants with low mood or depressive symptoms to promote dietary behavior change. Different versions of the My Food & Mood program were tested during optimization. Iterations were developed based on user feedback and usage analysis.
The purpose of this study was to compare engagement and nonusage attrition across 4 program iterations-which differed by platform format, delivery mode, and activity type-to create an optimized version.
Each program version contained modular videos with key activities with respect to implementing behavior change techniques of equivalent levels of required participation and length: version 1.0, desktop program and smartphone app; version 2.1, desktop or smartphone program; version 2.2, desktop program; and version 3.0, smartphone app. Adults with PHQ-8 scores of 5 or greater were recruited online and assigned to 1 of the 4 versions. Participants were asked to use the program for 8 weeks and complete measures at weeks 4 and 8. Engagement data were collected from the web-based platform system logs and customized reports. Cox regression survival analysis examined nonusage attrition and Kruskal-Wallis tests compared engagement across each cohort.
A total of 614 adults participated. Kruskal-Wallis tests showed significant differences across the 4 cohorts in all engagement measures. The smartphone app (version 3.0) had the greatest engagement as measured by weeks engaged, total usage time, total time key activities, number of active sessions, percentage of activities completed against protocol, goals completed, and percentage of videos watched. Cox regression multivariate survival analysis showed referral from a health practitioner (hazard ratio [HR] 0.344, P=.001) and greater proficiency with computers (HR 0.796, P=.049) reduced the risk of nonusage attrition. Computer confidence was associated with an increased risk of nonusage attrition.
My Food & Mood version 3.0, a dietary intervention delivered via smartphone app with self-monitoring tools for diet quality and mood monitoring, was the version with greatest engagement in a population with low mood or depression. The iterative design techniques employed and analysis of feedback from participants resulted in a program that achieved lower rates of nonusage attrition and higher rates of intensity of use.
在线干预可以成为一种经济高效的方式,能够将项目传递给大量人群,而不受地理位置的限制。然而,基于网络的干预中的损耗往往是一个问题。开发让参与者保持参与度的方法对于确保有效性和限制潜在偏差很重要。我们开发了一种基于网络的饮食干预措施,作为“我的饮食与情绪”研究的一部分,该研究旨在优化让情绪低落或有抑郁症状的参与者参与进来的方式,以促进饮食行为改变。在优化过程中对“我的饮食与情绪”项目的不同版本进行了测试。根据用户反馈和使用分析进行了迭代开发。
本研究的目的是比较4个项目迭代版本(在平台格式、交付模式和活动类型方面存在差异)的参与度和未使用损耗情况,以创建一个优化版本。
每个项目版本都包含模块化视频以及关键活动,这些活动涉及实施同等参与度和时长要求的行为改变技术:版本1.0,桌面程序和智能手机应用程序;版本2.1,桌面或智能手机程序;版本2.2,桌面程序;版本3.0,智能手机应用程序。在线招募了PHQ - 8得分在5分及以上的成年人,并将他们分配到4个版本中的一个。要求参与者使用该程序8周,并在第4周和第8周完成测量。参与度数据从基于网络的平台系统日志和定制报告中收集。Cox回归生存分析检查未使用损耗情况,Kruskal - Wallis检验比较每个队列的参与度。
共有614名成年人参与。Kruskal - Wallis检验显示,在所有参与度测量指标上,4个队列之间存在显著差异。以参与周数、总使用时间、关键活动总时间、活跃会话数、按照方案完成的活动百分比、完成的目标以及观看视频的百分比来衡量,智能手机应用程序(版本3.0)的参与度最高。Cox回归多变量生存分析显示,来自健康从业者的推荐(风险比[HR] 0.344,P = 0.001)以及更高的计算机熟练程度(HR 0.796,P = 0.049)降低了未使用损耗的风险。计算机信心与未使用损耗风险增加相关。
“我的饮食与情绪”版本3.0,一种通过智能手机应用程序提供的饮食干预措施,带有用于饮食质量和情绪监测的自我监测工具,是在情绪低落或抑郁人群中参与度最高的版本。所采用的迭代设计技术以及对参与者反馈的分析产生了一个未使用损耗率较低且使用强度较高的项目。