Suppr超能文献

年龄对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者心脏导管插入术的使用及相关结局的影响。

Influence of age on use of cardiac catheterization and associated outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Bagnall Alan J, Goodman Shaun G, Fox Keith A A, Yan Raymond T, Gore Joel M, Cheema Asim N, Huynh Thao, Chauret Denis, Fitchett David H, Langer Anatoly, Yan Andrew T

机构信息

Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 1;103(11):1530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.369. Epub 2009 Apr 8.

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials support the use of an early invasive strategy in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although risk increases with age, limited data are available to support this strategy in older patients. The aims of this study were to examine temporal trends in the management and outcomes of NSTE ACS in elderly patients and to explore reasons for the lower use of early angiography in the aged population. Data from 11,732 patients with NSTE ACS were collected from 3 consecutive Canadian registries (ACS I, ACS II, and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE]/GRACE2) from 1999 to 2007. Rates of in-hospital cardiac catheterization, revascularization, infarction or reinfarction, and death were stratified by age (<65, 65 to 74, and > or = 75 years). Although overall, rates of in-hospital catheterization and revascularization increased over time (p <0.001), the largest increase occurred in patients aged <65 years. The strongest independent negative predictor of the use of cardiac catheterization was age > or = 75 years (adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.56, p <0.001). Use of an early invasive approach was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality across all age groups, but the absolute difference was greatest in patients aged > or = 75 years. The underestimation of risk by physicians (ascertained in ACS II) was the most common reason for choosing a conservative strategy. In conclusion, despite an overall increased use of an early invasive strategy, elderly patients with NSTE ACS remain significantly less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization and revascularization and are often erroneously perceived to be at low risk by their physicians. Future studies should determine whether more aggressive treatment of these high-risk elderly patients improves outcomes.

摘要

随机对照试验支持对非ST段抬高(NSTE)急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)高危患者采用早期侵入性策略。虽然风险随年龄增加,但支持在老年患者中采用该策略的数据有限。本研究的目的是检查老年患者NSTE ACS管理和结局的时间趋势,并探讨老年人群中早期血管造影使用率较低的原因。从1999年至2007年连续的3个加拿大注册研究(ACS I、ACS II以及急性冠状动脉事件全球注册研究[GRACE]/GRACE2)中收集了11732例NSTE ACS患者的数据。住院期间心脏导管插入术、血运重建、梗死或再梗死以及死亡的发生率按年龄(<65岁、65至74岁以及≥75岁)分层。尽管总体而言,住院期间导管插入术和血运重建率随时间增加(p<0.001),但最大增幅出现在<65岁的患者中。心脏导管插入术使用的最强独立负性预测因素是年龄≥75岁(校正比值比0.45,95%置信区间0.37至0.56,p<0.001)。采用早期侵入性方法与所有年龄组1年死亡率降低相关,但绝对差异在≥75岁的患者中最大。医生对风险的低估(在ACS II中确定)是选择保守策略最常见的原因。总之,尽管早期侵入性策略的总体使用有所增加,但NSTE ACS老年患者接受心脏导管插入术和血运重建的可能性仍然显著较低,并且医生常常错误地认为他们风险较低。未来研究应确定对这些高危老年患者进行更积极的治疗是否能改善结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验