Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Karamay Municipal People's Hospital, Karamay, China.
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):920-931. doi: 10.1111/os.12795. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks (LFCNB) and iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve blocks (IHINB) on postoperative pain and functional outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA).
In this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing THA via the DAA between January 2019 and November 2019 were stratified into two groups based on their date of admission. Sixty-seven patients received LFCNB and IHINB along with periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) (nerve block group), and 75 patients received PIA alone (control group). The outcomes included postoperative morphine consumption, postoperative pain assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the QoR-15 score, and functional recovery measured as quadriceps strength, time to first straight leg rise, daily ambulation distance, and duration of hospitalization. The Oxford hip score and the UCLA activity level rating were assessed at 1 and 3 months after surgery. In addition, postoperative complications were recorded. Patients were also compared based on the type of incision used during surgery (traditional longitudinal or "bikini" incision).
Patients in the nerve block group showed significantly lower postoperative morphine consumption, lower resting VAS scores within 12 h postoperatively, lower VAS scores during motion within 24 h postoperatively, and better QoR-15 scores on postoperative day 1. These patients also showed significantly better functional recovery during hospitalization. At 1-month and 3-month outpatient follow up, the two groups showed no significant differences in Oxford hip score or UCLA activity level rating. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications. Similar results were observed when patients were stratified by type of incision, except that the duration of hospitalization was similar.
Compared to PIA alone, a combination of LFCNB and IHINB along with PIA can improve early pain relief, reduce morphine consumption, and accelerate functional recovery, without increasing complications after THA via the DAA.
本研究旨在探讨股外侧皮神经阻滞(LFCNB)和髂腹下/髂腹股沟神经阻滞(IHINB)联合关节周围浸润镇痛(PIA)对直接前入路(DAA)全髋关节置换术(THA)后疼痛和功能恢复的疗效和安全性。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,根据入院日期将 2019 年 1 月至 2019 年 11 月间接受 DAA 行 THA 的患者分为两组。67 例患者接受 LFCNB 和 IHINB 联合 PIA(神经阻滞组),75 例患者仅接受 PIA(对照组)。观察指标包括术后吗啡用量、术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)、QoR-15 评分、股四头肌力量、首次直腿抬高时间、每日活动距离和住院时间等功能恢复情况。术后 1 个月和 3 个月时采用牛津髋关节评分和 UCLA 活动水平评分进行评估。此外,还记录了术后并发症。并根据手术切口类型(传统纵向切口或“比基尼”切口)对患者进行了比较。
神经阻滞组患者术后吗啡用量明显减少,术后 12 小时内静息 VAS 评分较低,术后 24 小时内活动时 VAS 评分较低,术后第 1 天 QoR-15 评分较高。这些患者在住院期间的功能恢复也明显更好。在术后 1 个月和 3 个月的门诊随访中,两组在牛津髋关节评分或 UCLA 活动水平评分方面均无显著差异。术后并发症发生率也无显著差异。当按切口类型分层时,除住院时间相似外,结果也相似。
与单独 PIA 相比,LFCNB 和 IHINB 联合 PIA 可在不增加 DAA 行 THA 后并发症的情况下,改善术后早期疼痛缓解,减少吗啡用量,并加速功能恢复。