Suppr超能文献

超声引导内收肌管阻滞联合股外侧皮神经阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。

Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block for post-operative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.

Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2021 Jun;45(6):1421-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04549-2. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether adductor canal block (ACB) combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCNB) could improve the efficacy of post-operative analgesia in a comparison with a standard peri-articular infiltration analgesia (PIA) after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

One hundred and sixty patients of scheduled unilateral primary TKA were randomly allocated into two groups for post-operative analgesia. Eighty cases were treated with ACB combined with LFCNB and the other eighty treated with PIA. The primary outcomes were pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and rescue pain killer consumption, and the secondary outcomes were knee active range of motion (ROM), quadriceps strength, patients' ambulation ability, Knee Society Score (KSS), length of hospital stay, and adverse events.

RESULTS

We found that ACB combined with LFCNB was better on decreasing the post-operative pain score within 12 hours at rest and 8 h with activity (p < 0.05) and provided longer duration of analgesia (19.91 ± 5.09 VS 12.06 ± 3.67 h, p < 0.01) and less rescue morphine consumption (13.63 ± 9.84 vs 18.00 ± 11.52 mg, p = 0.011) than the PIA. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05) in terms of knee ROM, quadriceps strength, daily mobilization distance, KSS, and complication occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

ACB combined with LFCNB provides a significantly better pain control, less opioid consumption, and longer duration of analgesia than peri-articular infiltration while preserving muscle function without affecting knee functional recovery nor the length of stay or side effects occurrence.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨与标准关节周围浸润镇痛(peri-articular infiltration analgesia,PIA)相比,股收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block,ACB)联合股外侧皮神经阻滞(lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block,LFCNB)能否提高全膝关节置换(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)后的镇痛效果。

方法

将 160 例行单侧初次 TKA 的患者随机分为两组进行术后镇痛。80 例采用 ACB 联合 LFCNB 治疗,80 例采用 PIA 治疗。主要结局指标为疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)和解救性止痛药消耗,次要结局指标为膝关节主动活动范围(range of motion,ROM)、股四头肌力量、患者步行能力、膝关节学会评分(Knee Society Score,KSS)、住院时间和不良反应。

结果

我们发现,在休息时和活动时的 12 小时内,ACB 联合 LFCNB 组术后疼痛评分较低(p<0.05),镇痛持续时间较长(19.91±5.09 比 12.06±3.67 小时,p<0.01),解救性吗啡消耗量较少(13.63±9.84 比 18.00±11.52 毫克,p=0.011)。两组在膝关节 ROM、股四头肌力量、每日活动距离、KSS 和并发症发生率方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

ACB 联合 LFCNB 与 PIA 相比,能显著更好地控制疼痛,减少阿片类药物的消耗,延长镇痛时间,同时保持肌肉功能,不影响膝关节功能恢复、住院时间或不良反应的发生。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验