Little Mark P, Wakeford Richard, Hatch Maureen, Ainsbury Elizabeth A, Tawn E Janet
Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9778.
Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Radiat Res. 2021 Jun 1;195(6):584-589. doi: 10.1667/RADE-21-00046.1.
Recently, it has been proposed that the doses received from 133Xe released during the accident in 1979 at the Three Mile Island (TMI) plant in Pennsylvania were much higher than has been conventionally assessed, due to a gross underestimation of the relative biological effectiveness of electrons from beta-particle-emitting radionuclides within the body. The central evidence cited in support of this proposal was the doses derived from cytogenetic analyses of blood sampled in the mid-1990s from people living near TMI at the time of the accident. However, the chromosome aberration data show a marked discrepancy in biodosimetric estimates evaluated from the frequencies of stable translocations and unstable dicentrics (corrected for temporal attenuation), strongly suggesting that exposures to clastogenic agents occurred long after the TMI accident. Few details have been reported on the people providing the blood samples and how they were selected for study. Crucially, this lack of information includes the distributions in the exposed and control groups of age at sampling, which is a critical factor in interpreting translocation data. Contrary to the recent claim, these cytogenetic data offer no support to the suggestion of a serious underestimation of internal doses from beta particles or from 133Xe discharged during the TMI accident.
最近有人提出,1979年宾夕法尼亚州三里岛(TMI)核电站事故期间释放的133Xe所致剂量比传统评估的要高得多,原因是对体内β粒子发射放射性核素产生的电子的相对生物效应严重低估。支持这一观点的核心证据是对20世纪90年代中期从事故发生时居住在TMI附近的人采集的血液进行细胞遗传学分析得出的剂量。然而,染色体畸变数据显示,根据稳定易位和不稳定双着丝粒频率(校正时间衰减)评估的生物剂量估计存在显著差异,这强烈表明在TMI事故很久之后才发生了致断裂剂暴露。关于提供血样的人员及其选择方式的细节报道很少。至关重要的是,这些信息缺失包括采样时暴露组和对照组的年龄分布,而这是解释易位数据的关键因素。与最近的说法相反,这些细胞遗传学数据并不支持严重低估TMI事故期间β粒子或133Xe内照射剂量的观点。