• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3种尿比重计在不同温度下测量糖度和尿液溶液的可靠性

Reliability of 3 Urine Specific Gravity Meters for Measuring Brix and Urine Solutions at Different Temperatures.

作者信息

Wardenaar Floris, Ortega-Santos Carmen P, Vento Kaila, Olzinski Stephanie, Olig Jason, Kavouras Stavros, Johnston Carol

机构信息

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2021 Apr 1;56(4):389-395. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0142.20.

DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0142.20
PMID:33788928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8063665/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Urine specific gravity (USG) should be measured at room temperature (20°C), but the temperature of the sample is not always considered.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of sample temperature on the measurement accuracy of a digital refractometer (DIG), manual optical refractometer (MAN), and hydrometer (HYD).

DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Urine specific gravity.

RESULTS

Experiment 1 (24 Brix (°Bx) samples) showed that measurements via the DIG and MAN did not differ from the reference, but HYD provided lower or inconsistent values compared with °Bx and was highly correlated with °Bx solutions (r, > = 0.89). The overall diagnostic ability of elevated USG cut-off values (≥1.020, ≥1.025, ≥1.030) was high for all tools (area under the curve >0.92). Misclassification of samples increased from 0 to 2 at 1.020 to 1 to 3 samples at cutoffs of 1.025 and 1.030 USG. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the DIG 5°C underreported slightly without reporting bias (r = -0.344, P = .13); all other plots for the DIG, MAN, and HYD showed considerably larger underreporting at higher concentrations (r = -0.21 to -0.97 with P >.02) at all temperatures. The outcomes of experiment 2 (33 fresh urine samples) using DIG 20°C as the standard demonstrated only negligible differences between the DIG and MAN at all temperatures but larger differences using the HYD.

CONCLUSIONS

All tools showed reporting bias compared with the °Bx solutions, which can affect the classification of low and high urine concentration at higher USG cutoff values, especially with a sample temperature of 37°C.

摘要

背景

尿比重(USG)应在室温(20°C)下测量,但样本温度并非总是被考虑在内。

目的

评估样本温度对数字折射仪(DIG)、手动光学折射仪(MAN)和比重计(HYD)测量准确性的影响。

设计

描述性实验室研究。

主要观察指标

尿比重。

结果

实验1(24个白利度(°Bx)样本)表明,通过DIG和MAN测得的结果与参考值无差异,但与°Bx相比,HYD得出的值较低或不一致,且与°Bx溶液高度相关(r≥0.89)。所有工具对于升高的USG临界值(≥1.020、≥1.025、≥1.030)的总体诊断能力较高(曲线下面积>0.92)。在USG临界值为1.020时,样本误分类从0增加到2,在临界值为1.025和1.030时,误分类从1增加到3个样本。Bland-Altman分析表明,DIG在5°C时略有低估但无报告偏倚(r = -0.344,P = 0.13);在所有温度下,DIG、MAN和HYD的所有其他图表在较高浓度下均显示出明显更大的低估(r = -0.21至-0.97,P>.02)。以DIG 20°C作为标准的实验2(33个新鲜尿液样本)的结果表明,在所有温度下,DIG和MAN之间仅存在微不足道的差异,但使用HYD时差异更大。

结论

与°Bx溶液相比,所有工具均显示出报告偏倚,这可能会影响在较高USG临界值下对低尿浓度和高尿浓度的分类,尤其是在样本温度为37°C时。

相似文献

1
Reliability of 3 Urine Specific Gravity Meters for Measuring Brix and Urine Solutions at Different Temperatures.3种尿比重计在不同温度下测量糖度和尿液溶液的可靠性
J Athl Train. 2021 Apr 1;56(4):389-395. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0142.20.
2
Validity of Digital and Manual Refractometers for Measuring Urine Specific Gravity During Field Operations: A Brief Report.野外作业期间数字式和手动折射仪测量尿比重的有效性:简要报告
Mil Med. 2019 Dec 1;184(11-12):e632-e636. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz082.
3
Agreement of urine specific gravity measurements between manual and digital refractometers.手动折射仪与数字折射仪测量尿比重的一致性。
J Athl Train. 2015 Jan;50(1):59-64. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.47. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
4
Variability among four refractometers for the measurement of urine specific gravity and comparison with urine osmolality in dogs.四种折射仪测量犬尿比重的变异性及与尿渗透压的比较
Vet Clin Pathol. 2019 Dec;48(4):702-709. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12781. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
5
Comparison of a Schmidt and Haensch refractometer and an Atago PAL-USG Cat refractometer for determination of urine specific gravity in dogs and cats.施密特和黑恩施折射仪与爱拓PAL-USG Cat折射仪用于测定犬猫尿比重的比较。
Vet Clin Pathol. 2014 Mar;43(1):63-6. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12110. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Interobserver reliability of canine urine specific gravity assessed by analog or digital refractometers.犬尿液比重的模拟或数字折射仪评估的观察者间可靠性。
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2021 May;33(3):611-614. doi: 10.1177/1040638721998295. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
7
Influence of preanalytic and analytic variables in canine and feline urine specific gravity measurement by refractometer.分析前和分析变量对犬猫尿液比重折射计测量的影响
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2020 Jan;32(1):36-43. doi: 10.1177/1040638719896785. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
8
Comparison of digital and optical hand-held refractometers for the measurement of feline urine specific gravity.数字式和光学手持式折射仪用于测量猫尿比重的比较。
J Feline Med Surg. 2011 Feb;13(2):152-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2010.09.012. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
9
Comparison of a digital and an optical analogue hand-held refractometer for the measurement of canine urine specific gravity.比较数字式和光学模拟手持折射仪测量犬尿液比重。
Vet Rec. 2012 May 5;170(18):463. doi: 10.1136/vr.100348. Epub 2012 Apr 14.
10
Assessment of different methods to estimate bovine colostrum quality on farm.农场中评估不同方法以估算牛初乳质量
N Z Vet J. 2016 Sep;64(5):263-7. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2016.1184109. Epub 2016 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypohydration is evident in elite orienteering athletes during a two-day race: a descriptive study.一项描述性研究:两日赛期间精英定向越野运动员存在低水合状态
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Aug 15;17(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01300-5.
2
Validity of combined hydration self-assessment measurements to estimate a low vs. high urine concentration in a small sample of (tactical) athletes.在一小部分(战术)运动员样本中,联合水化自我评估测量用于估计低尿浓度与高尿浓度的有效性。
Eur J Nutr. 2024 Feb;63(1):185-193. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03254-1. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Validity of Urine Color Scoring Using Different Light Conditions and Scoring Techniques to Assess Urine Concentration.不同光照条件和评分技术下的尿液颜色评分评估尿液浓度的有效性。
J Athl Train. 2022 Feb 1;57(2):191-198. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0389.21.