Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States.
John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
To demonstrate the effectiveness of medication abortion with the implementation of telemedicine and a no-test protocol in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who had a medication abortion up to 77 days gestation at the University of Hawai'i between April and November 2020. Patients had the option of traditional in clinic care or telemedicine with either in clinic pickup or mailing of medications. During this time, a no-test protocol for medication abortion without prior labs or ultrasound was in place for eligible patients. The primary outcome was the rate of successful medication abortion without surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes included abortion-related complications.
A total of 334 patients were dispensed mifepristone and misoprostol, 149 (44.6%) with telemedicine with in-person pickup of medications, 75 (22.5%) via telemedicine with medications mailed, and 110 (32.9%) via traditional in person visits. The overall rate of complete medication abortion without surgical intervention was 95.8%, with success rates of 96.8, 97.1, and 93.6% for the clinic pickup, mail, and clinic visit groups, respectively. Success for those without an ultrasound performed prior to the procedure was 96.6%, compared to 95.5% for those with ultrasound. We obtained follow-up data for 87.8% of participants.
Medication abortion was safe and effective while offering multiple modes of care delivery including telemedicine visits without an ultrasound performed prior to dispensing medications.
Incorporating telemedicine and a no-test protocol for medication abortion is safe and has the potential to expand access to abortion care. All care models had low rates of adverse events, which contradicts the idea that the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategyincreases the safety of medication abortion.
展示在应对 COVID-19 大流行期间实施远程医疗和无检测方案的药物流产的有效性。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2020 年 4 月至 11 月期间在夏威夷大学接受药物流产的妊娠 77 天内的患者。患者可以选择传统的门诊护理或远程医疗,包括门诊取药或药物邮寄。在此期间,对于符合条件的患者,药物流产采用无检测方案,无需事先进行实验室检查或超声检查。主要结局是无手术干预成功进行药物流产的比例。次要结局包括与流产相关的并发症。
共为 334 名患者发放了米非司酮和米索前列醇,其中 149 名(44.6%)采用远程医疗和门诊取药,75 名(22.5%)采用远程医疗和药物邮寄,110 名(32.9%)采用传统门诊就诊。无手术干预的完全药物流产总体成功率为 95.8%,门诊取药、邮寄和门诊就诊组的成功率分别为 96.8%、97.1%和 93.6%。对于未在手术前进行超声检查的患者,成功率为 96.6%,而对于进行超声检查的患者,成功率为 95.5%。我们获得了 87.8%参与者的随访数据。
药物流产是安全有效的,同时提供了多种护理提供模式,包括远程医疗就诊,无需在发放药物前进行超声检查。
将远程医疗和无检测方案纳入药物流产是安全的,并有潜力扩大流产护理的可及性。所有护理模式的不良事件发生率都较低,这与风险评估和缓解策略增加药物流产安全性的观点相矛盾。