Saxena Abha, Bouvier Paul André, Shamsi-Gooshki Ehsan, Köhler Johannes, Schwartz Lisa J
Institute Éthique Histoire Humanités, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Independent Bioethics Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 31. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106959.
In 2016, following pandemic influenza threats and the 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease outbreaks, the WHO developed a guidance document for managing ethical issues in infectious disease outbreaks. In this article, we analyse some ethical issues that have had a predominant role in decision making in response to the current COVID-19 pandemic but were absent or not addressed in the same ways in the 2016 guidance document. A pandemic results in a health crisis and social and political crises both nationally and globally. The ethical implications of these global effects should be properly identified so that appropriate actions can be taken globally and not just in national isolation. Our analysis, which is a starting point to test the broader relevance of the 2016 WHO document that remains the only available guidance document applicable globally, concludes that the WHO guidance should be updated to provide reasoned and thoughtful comprehensive ethics advice for the sound management of the current and future pandemics.
2016年,在面临大流行性流感威胁以及2014 - 2016年埃博拉病毒病疫情之后,世界卫生组织制定了一份关于管理传染病疫情中伦理问题的指导文件。在本文中,我们分析了一些在应对当前新冠疫情的决策中发挥了主要作用,但在2016年指导文件中未出现或以同样方式处理的伦理问题。一场大流行会在国家和全球层面引发健康危机以及社会和政治危机。这些全球影响的伦理含义应得到恰当识别,以便能在全球范围内而非仅在各国孤立行动的情况下采取适当行动。我们的分析是检验2016年世卫组织文件更广泛相关性的一个起点,该文件仍是唯一适用于全球的现有指导文件,分析得出结论认为,世卫组织的指导应予以更新,以便为妥善管理当前及未来的大流行提供合理且深思熟虑的全面伦理建议。