Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gilllings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Nov 1;5(11):653-662. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.55.
Recognizing the importance of having a broad exploration of how cultural perspectives may shape thinking about ethical considerations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded four regional meetings in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean to explore these perspectives relevant to pandemic influenza preparedness and response. The meetings were attended by 168 health professionals, scientists, academics, ethicists, religious leaders, and other community members representing 40 countries in these regions.
We reviewed the meeting reports, notes and stories and mapped outcomes to the key ethical challenges for pandemic influenza response described in the World Health Organization's (WHO's) guidance, Ethical Considerations in Developing a Public Health Response to Pandemic Influenza: transparency and public engagement, allocation of resources, social distancing, obligations to and of healthcare workers, and international collaboration.
The important role of transparency and public engagement were widely accepted among participants. However, there was general agreement that no "one size fits all" approach to allocating resources can address the variety of economic, cultural and other contextual factors that must be taken into account. The importance of social distancing as a tool to limit disease transmission was also recognized, but the difficulties associated with this measure were acknowledged. There was agreement that healthcare workers often have competing obligations and that government has a responsibility to assist healthcare workers in doing their job by providing appropriate training and equipment. Finally, there was agreement about the importance of international collaboration for combating global health threats.
Although some cultural differences in the values that frame pandemic preparedness and response efforts were observed, participants generally agreed on the key ethical principles discussed in the WHO's guidance. Most significantly the input gathered from these regional meetings pointed to the important role that procedural ethics can play in bringing people and countries together to respond to the shared health threat posed by a pandemic influenza despite the existence of cultural differences.
为了充分认识到从文化视角广泛探索伦理考量因素的重要性,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)资助在非洲、亚洲、拉丁美洲和东地中海举办了四次区域会议,以探讨与大流行性流感防备和应对相关的这些视角。来自这四个地区的 40 个国家的 168 名卫生专业人员、科学家、学者、伦理学家、宗教领袖和其他社区成员参加了会议。
我们审查了会议报告、笔记和故事,并根据世界卫生组织(世卫组织)指南中描述的大流行性流感应对的主要伦理挑战,将结果映射到透明度和公众参与、资源分配、社会隔离、医护人员的义务和责任以及国际合作。
与会者普遍接受透明度和公众参与的重要作用。但是,与会者普遍认为,没有一种“一刀切”的资源分配方法可以解决必须考虑的各种经济、文化和其他背景因素。作为限制疾病传播工具的社会隔离的重要性也得到了承认,但也承认了这一措施所带来的困难。与会者一致认为,医护人员通常有相互竞争的义务,政府有责任通过提供适当的培训和设备来帮助医护人员履行职责。最后,与会者一致认为国际合作对于应对全球卫生威胁非常重要。
尽管在大流行性流感防备和应对工作的价值观方面观察到了一些文化差异,但与会者普遍同意世卫组织指南中讨论的主要伦理原则。最重要的是,从这些区域会议收集的意见表明,程序伦理在使各国和人民团结起来应对大流行性流感这一共同的健康威胁方面可以发挥重要作用,尽管存在文化差异。