Leitner Michael Christian, Hutzler Florian, Schuster Sarah, Vignali Lorenzo, Marvan Patrick, Reitsamer H A, Hawelka Stefan
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 17;6(1):e000429. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000429. eCollection 2021.
Several studies report evidence for training-related neuroplasticity in the visual cortex, while other studies suggest that improvements simply reflect inadequate eye fixation control during perimetric prediagnostics and postdiagnostics.
To improve diagnostics, a new eye-tracking-based methodology for visual field analysis (eye-tracking-based visual field analysis (EFA)) was developed. The EFA is based on static automated perimetry and additionally takes individual eye movements in real time into account and compensates for them. In the present study, an evaluation of the EFA with the help of blind spots of 58 healthy participants and the individual visual field defects of 23 clinical patients is provided. With the help of the EFA, optical coherence tomography, Goldmann perimetry and a Humphrey field analyser, these natural and acquired scotomas were diagnosed and the results were compared accordingly.
The EFA provides a SE of measurement of 0.38° for the right eye (OD) and 0.50° for the left eye (OS), leading to 0.44° of visual angle for both eyes (OU). Based on participants' individual results, the EFA provides disattenuated correlation (validity) of 1.00 for both OD and OS. Results from patients suffering from cortical lesions and glaucoma further indicate that the EFA is capable of diagnosing acquired scotoma validly and is applicable for clinical use.
Outcomes indicate that the EFA is highly reliable and precise in diagnosing individual shape and location of scotoma and capable of recording changes of visual field defects (after intervention) with unprecedented precision. Test duration is comparable to established instruments and due to the high customisability of the EFA, assessment duration can be shortened by adapting the diagnostic procedure to the patients' individual visual field characteristics. Therefore, the saccade-compensating methodology enables researchers and healthcare professionals to rule out eye movements as a source of inaccuracies in pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments.
多项研究报告了视觉皮层中与训练相关的神经可塑性的证据,而其他研究则表明,改善仅仅反映了周边视野预诊断和后诊断期间眼动注视控制不足。
为了改进诊断方法,开发了一种基于眼动追踪的视野分析新方法(基于眼动追踪的视野分析(EFA))。EFA基于静态自动视野计,此外还实时考虑并补偿个体眼动。在本研究中,对58名健康参与者的盲点和23名临床患者的个体视野缺损进行了EFA评估。借助EFA、光学相干断层扫描、Goldmann视野计和Humphrey视野分析仪,对这些自然和后天性暗点进行了诊断,并相应地比较了结果。
EFA测量右眼(OD)的标准误差为0.38°,左眼(OS)为0.50°,双眼(OU)的视角为0.44°。根据参与者的个体结果,EFA对OD和OS的去衰减相关性(有效性)均为1.00。患有皮质病变和青光眼患者的结果进一步表明,EFA能够有效诊断后天性暗点,适用于临床应用。
结果表明,EFA在诊断暗点的个体形状和位置方面高度可靠且精确,并且能够以前所未有的精度记录视野缺损(干预后)的变化。测试持续时间与现有仪器相当,并且由于EFA的高度可定制性,可以通过根据患者个体视野特征调整诊断程序来缩短评估持续时间。因此,扫视补偿方法使研究人员和医疗保健专业人员能够在预评估、后评估和随访评估中排除眼动作为不准确来源的影响。