Lee Sang Kyu, Huang Sheng, Zhang Lei, Ballangrud Ase M, Aristophanous Michalis, Cervino Arriba Laura I, Li Guang
Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 May;22(5):48-57. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13241. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
To evaluate the accuracy of surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) in cranial patient setup by direct comparison between optical surface imaging (OSI) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), before applying SGRT-only setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer.
Using CBCT as reference, SGRT setup accuracy was examined based on 269 patients (415 treatments) treated with frameless cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) during 2018-2019. Patients were immobilized in customized head molds and open-face masks and monitored using OSI during treatment. The facial skin area in planning CT was used as OSI region of interest (ROI) for automatic surface alignment and the skull was used as the landmark for automatic CBCT/CT registration. A 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) couch was used. Immediately after CBCT setup, an OSI verification image was captured, recording the SGRT setup differences. These differences were analyzed in 6DOFs and as a function of isocenter positions away from the anterior surface to assess OSI-ROI bias. The SGRT in-room setup time was estimated and compared with CBCT and orthogonal 2D kilovoltage (2DkV) setups.
The SGRT setup difference (magnitude) is found to be 1.0 ± 2.5 mm and 0.1˚±1.4˚ on average among 415 treatments and within 5 mm/3˚ with greater than 95% confidence level (P < 0.001). Outliers were observed for very-posterior isocenters: 15 differences (3.6%) are >5.0mm and 9 (2.2%) are >3.0˚. The setup differences show minor correlations (|r| < 0.45) between translational and rotational DOFs and a minor increasing trend (<1.0 mm) in the anterior-to-posterior direction. The SGRT setup time is 0.8 ± 0.3 min, much shorter than CBCT (5 ± 2 min) and 2DkV (2 ± 1 min) setups.
This study demonstrates that SGRT has sufficient accuracy for fast in-room patient setup and allows real-time motion monitoring for beam holding during treatment, potentially useful to guide radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer with standard fractionation.
在仅采用表面引导放疗(SGRT)进行脑癌和鼻咽癌常规放疗的设置之前,通过光学表面成像(OSI)与锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的直接比较,评估SGRT在颅脑患者摆位中的准确性。
以CBCT为参考,基于2018 - 2019年期间接受无框架颅脑立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)的269例患者(415次治疗),检查SGRT的摆位准确性。患者被固定在定制的头部模具和开放式面罩中,并在治疗期间使用OSI进行监测。在计划CT中的面部皮肤区域用作OSI感兴趣区域(ROI)进行自动表面对齐,颅骨用作自动CBCT/CT配准的标志。使用六自由度(6DOF)治疗床。在CBCT摆位后立即采集OSI验证图像,记录SGRT摆位差异。在6个自由度下以及作为距前表面等中心位置的函数分析这些差异,以评估OSI - ROI偏差。估计SGRT在室内的摆位时间,并与CBCT和正交二维千伏(2DkV)摆位进行比较。
在415次治疗中,SGRT摆位差异(幅度)平均为1.0 ± 2.5 mm和0.1˚±1.4˚,在95%以上置信水平下(P < 0.001)在5 mm/3˚以内。对于非常靠后的等中心观察到异常值:15个差异(3.6%)>5.0 mm,9个(2.2%)>3.0˚。摆位差异在平移和旋转自由度之间显示出较小的相关性(|r| < 0.45),并且在前后方向上有较小的增加趋势(<1.0 mm)。SGRT摆位时间为0.8 ± 0.3分钟,远短于CBCT(5 ± 2分钟)和2DkV(2 ± 1分钟)摆位。
本研究表明,SGRT对于快速的室内患者摆位具有足够的准确性,并允许在治疗期间进行实时运动监测以保持射束,这对于指导标准分割的脑癌和鼻咽癌放疗可能有用。