Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2021 Mar;43(2):187-198. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2021.1900077. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is known to be heterogeneous in its cognitive features and course of progression. Whilst memory impairment is characteristic of amnestic MCI (aMCI), cognitive deficits other than memory can occur in both aMCI and non-amnestic MCI (naMCI) and accurate assessment of the subtypes of MCI is difficult for clinicians without the application of extensive neuropsychological testing. In this study, we examine metrics derived from recording of reflexive and voluntary saccadic eye movements as a potential alternative method for discriminating between subtypes and assessing cognitive functions in MCI.: A total of 29 MCI patients and 29 age- and education-matched healthy controls (HCs) participated in the cross-sectional study. We recorded and pro-saccades and anti-saccade responses. All the participants also completed a comprehensive neuropsychological tests battery.: Significant differences in saccadic eye movement were found between the subtypes of MCI and HCs. Patients with aMCI had a higher percentage of short latency "express" saccades than HCs. We found strong associations between saccadic reaction times and cognitive domains, including executive functions and attention. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) was also found to correlate with uncorrected errors in the anti-saccade task.: The increased proportion of saccades in the express latency range in aMCI may be indicative of problems with cognitive inhibitory control in these patients. A focus on this and other saccade metrics in the preclinical and prodromal stages of dementia may help to predict the clinical progression of the disease and direct interventions for the management of MCI. The clinical significance of saccadic eye movement impairments in MCI is not yet fully understood and should be investigated in further studies using larger samples.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)在认知特征和进展过程中是异质的。虽然记忆损伤是遗忘型 MCI(aMCI)的特征,但记忆以外的认知缺陷也可能发生在 aMCI 和非遗忘型 MCI(naMCI)中,如果没有广泛的神经心理学测试,临床医生很难准确评估 MCI 的亚型。在这项研究中,我们检查了从反射性和自愿性眼球运动记录中得出的指标,作为区分亚型和评估 MCI 认知功能的潜在替代方法。
共有 29 名 MCI 患者和 29 名年龄和教育程度匹配的健康对照者(HCs)参与了这项横断面研究。我们记录了和 反射性和自愿性眼球运动。所有参与者还完成了全面的神经心理学测试。
在 MCI 亚型和 HCs 之间发现了眼球运动的显著差异。aMCI 患者的短潜伏期“表达”眼球运动的百分比高于 HCs。我们发现眼球运动反应时间与认知领域之间存在很强的关联,包括执行功能和注意力。还发现简易精神状态检查(MMSE)与反扫视任务中的未校正错误相关。
在 aMCI 中,表达潜伏期范围内的眼球运动比例增加可能表明这些患者存在认知抑制控制问题。在痴呆症的临床前和前驱阶段,关注这一和其他眼球运动指标可能有助于预测疾病的临床进展,并为 MCI 的管理提供干预措施。眼球运动障碍在 MCI 中的临床意义尚未完全理解,应在进一步的研究中使用更大的样本进行调查。