Opwonya Julius, Wang Changwon, Jang Kyoung-Mi, Lee Kunho, Kim Joong Il, Kim Jaeuk U
Digital Health Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.
KM Convergence Science, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Apr 11;14:871432. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.871432. eCollection 2022.
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) may occur due to several forms of neurodegenerative diseases and non-degenerative conditions and is associated with cognitive impairment that does not affect everyday activities. For a timely diagnosis of MCI to prevent progression to dementia, a screening tool of fast, low-cost and easy access is needed. Recent research on eye movement hints it a potential application for the MCI screening. However, the precise extent of cognitive function decline and eye-movement control alterations in patients with MCI is still unclear.
This study examined executive control deficits and saccade behavioral changes in patients with MCI using comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and interleaved saccade paradigms.
Patients with MCI ( = 79) and age-matched cognitively healthy controls (HC) ( = 170) completed four saccadic eye-movement paradigms: prosaccade (PS)/antisaccade (AS), Go/No-go, and a battery of neuropsychological tests.
The findings revealed significantly longer latency in patients with MCI than in HC during the PS task. Additionally, patients with MCI had a lower proportion of correct responses and a marked increase in inhibition errors for both PS/AS and Go/No-go tasks. Furthermore, when patients with MCI made errors, they failed to self-correct many of these inhibition errors. In addition to the increase in inhibition errors and uncorrected inhibition errors, patients with MCI demonstrated a trend toward increased correction latencies. We also showed a relationship between neuropsychological scores and correct and error saccade responses.
Our results demonstrate that, similar to patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD), patients with MCI generate a high proportion of erroneous saccades toward the prepotent target and fail to self-correct many of these errors, which is consistent with an impairment of inhibitory control and error monitoring.
The interleaved PS/AS and Go/No-go paradigms are sensitive and objective at detecting subtle cognitive deficits and saccade changes in MCI, indicating that these saccadic eye movement paradigms have clinical potential as a screening tool for MCI.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)可能由多种神经退行性疾病和非退行性疾病引起,且与不影响日常活动的认知障碍相关。为了及时诊断MCI以预防其发展为痴呆症,需要一种快速、低成本且易于使用的筛查工具。最近关于眼动的研究提示其在MCI筛查中有潜在应用。然而,MCI患者认知功能下降和眼动控制改变的具体程度仍不清楚。
本研究使用综合神经心理学评估和交错扫视范式,研究MCI患者的执行控制缺陷和扫视行为变化。
79例MCI患者和170例年龄匹配的认知健康对照(HC)完成了四种眼跳运动范式:前向扫视(PS)/反向扫视(AS)、Go/No-go,以及一系列神经心理学测试。
研究结果显示,在PS任务中,MCI患者的潜伏期显著长于HC。此外,MCI患者在PS/AS和Go/No-go任务中的正确反应比例较低,抑制错误显著增加。此外,MCI患者出现错误时,未能自我纠正许多这些抑制错误。除了抑制错误和未纠正的抑制错误增加外,MCI患者还表现出校正潜伏期增加的趋势。我们还展示了神经心理学评分与正确和错误扫视反应之间的关系。
我们的结果表明,与阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者类似,MCI患者向优势目标产生的错误扫视比例很高,且未能自我纠正许多这些错误,这与抑制控制和错误监测受损一致。
交错的PS/AS和Go/No-go范式在检测MCI中细微的认知缺陷和扫视变化方面敏感且客观,表明这些眼跳运动范式作为MCI的筛查工具具有临床潜力。