• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种操纵阴茎长度来测量女性性满意度的新方法的初步研究:单案例实验设计。

A preliminary investigation of a novel method to manipulate penis length to measure female sexual satisfaction: a single-case experimental design.

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2021 Sep;128(3):374-385. doi: 10.1111/bju.15416. Epub 2021 May 7.

DOI:10.1111/bju.15416
PMID:33793040
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate a novel methodology and explore whether artificially reducing the depth of penetration during intercourse matters to women.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A study with a single-case experimental design ('n of 1'), in which a heterosexual couple act as their own control and the study is then replicated in subsequent couples, was conducted. Thirty-five couples were assessed for eligibility to participate. Twenty-nine couples without any sexual problems were randomized and 12 submitted sufficient data to analyse. As a proxy for reducing penis length, we artificially reduced the depth of penetration by using different sizes of silicone rings around the base of the man's erect penis. The main outcome measures were provided by the female partner on a scale of 0-100 and comprised: degree of (i) overall sexual pleasure; (ii) sexual pleasure from intercourse alone; and (iii) emotional connection to the male partner. The female partner was also asked before the experiment began to rate the degree of positive or negative change that would be personally meaningful for her.

RESULTS

On average, reducing the depth of penetration led to a statistically significant 18% reduction of overall sexual pleasure with an average 15% reduction in length of the penis. The longer the erect penis, the less likely the rings were to have an impact on sexual pleasure. There was a range of individual responses, however, with a minority of women reporting that reducing the depth of penetration was more pleasurable on some occasions.

CONCLUSIONS

Size may matter in women in a healthy stable relationship when there is penile shortening. Because of the small number of couples and the inclusion of men with an apparently long penis, our results are preliminary, and we welcome replication in a larger sample with a more diverse range of penile lengths. Our results should not be misinterpreted as meaning that increasing penile length will increase sexual pleasure in women.

摘要

目的

探究一种新方法,探讨在性交过程中人为减少阴茎插入深度是否对女性有影响。

研究设计与方法

采用单病例实验设计(“n 为 1”),即一对异性恋夫妇作为自身对照,然后在随后的夫妇中重复该研究。评估了 35 对夫妇是否有资格参与研究。随机选择 29 对无任何性问题的夫妇进行分组,其中 12 对夫妇提供了足够的数据进行分析。我们使用不同尺寸的硅酮环环绕男性勃起阴茎的根部,人为地减少阴茎长度,以此作为降低阴茎深度的替代方法。主要观察指标由女性伴侣以 0-100 分的量表提供,包括:(i)整体性快感程度;(ii)仅性交带来的性快感程度;以及(iii)与男性伴侣的情感联系。在实验开始前,女性伴侣还被要求评估对她个人有意义的积极或消极变化的程度。

结果

平均而言,减少阴茎插入深度会导致整体性快感显著降低 18%,阴茎长度平均减少 15%。阴茎勃起越长,环对性快感的影响就越小。然而,也有一些女性报告说,在某些情况下,减少阴茎插入深度会更加愉悦,存在个体差异。

结论

在健康稳定的性关系中,当存在阴茎缩短时,大小可能对女性很重要。由于夫妇数量较少,且纳入了阴茎明显较长的男性,因此我们的结果是初步的,我们欢迎在更大的样本中进行更广泛的阴茎长度范围内的复制研究。我们的结果不应被误解为意味着增加阴茎长度会增加女性的性快感。

相似文献

1
A preliminary investigation of a novel method to manipulate penis length to measure female sexual satisfaction: a single-case experimental design.一种操纵阴茎长度来测量女性性满意度的新方法的初步研究:单案例实验设计。
BJU Int. 2021 Sep;128(3):374-385. doi: 10.1111/bju.15416. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Evaluation of average penis length and the thoughts of Turkish men and partners. Is surgery necessary?评估土耳其男性及其伴侣的平均阴茎长度和想法。是否需要手术?
Rev Int Androl. 2024 Sep;22(3):74-81. doi: 10.22514/j.androl.2024.023. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Women who prefer longer penises are more likely to have vaginal orgasms (but not clitoral orgasms): implications for an evolutionary theory of vaginal orgasm.喜欢更长阴茎的女性更容易获得阴道高潮(但不是阴蒂高潮):对阴道高潮进化理论的启示。
J Sex Med. 2012 Dec;9(12):3079-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02917.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
4
Self-ratings of genital anatomy, sexual sensitivity and function in men using the 'Self-Assessment of Genital Anatomy and Sexual Function, Male' questionnaire.使用“男性生殖器官解剖与性功能自我评估”问卷对男性生殖器官解剖、性敏感度及功能进行自我评定。
BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08166.x. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
5
Anatomic maps of erogenous sensation and pleasure in the penis: are there difference between circumcised and uncircumcised men?阴茎性感和快感的解剖学图谱:割礼和未割礼男性之间有区别吗?
J Sex Med. 2023 Feb 27;20(3):253-259. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdac032.
6
Sexual Satisfaction, Performance, and Partner Response Following Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in Zambia: The Spear and Shield Project.赞比亚自愿男性割礼后性满意度、表现和伴侣反应:矛与盾项目。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Dec 17;3(4):606-18. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00163. Print 2015 Dec.
7
How curved is too curved? The severity of penile deformity may predict sexual disability among men with Peyronie's disease.弯曲到何种程度算过度弯曲?阴茎畸形的严重程度可能预示着患有 Peyronie 病的男性存在性功能障碍。
Int J Impot Res. 2013 May;25(3):109-12. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2012.48. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
8
Erect penile dimensions in a cohort of 778 Middle Eastern men: establishment of a nomogram.778名中东男性队列中的阴茎勃起尺寸:列线图的建立
J Sex Med. 2015 Jun;12(6):1402-6. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12894. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
9
How Big is Too Big? The Girth of Bestselling Insertive Sex Toys to Guide Maximal Neophallus Dimensions.多大才算大?畅销插入式性玩具的周长可指导最大人工阴茎尺寸。
J Sex Med. 2017 Nov;14(11):1455-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.09.012.
10
Erect penile length and circumference dimensions of 1,661 sexually active men in the United States.美国 1661 名活跃男性的阴茎勃起长度和周长尺寸。
J Sex Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):93-101. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12244. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of penis size on partner sexual satisfaction: a literature review.阴茎大小对性伴侣性满意度的影响:一项文献综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Sep;35(6):519-522. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00636-7. Epub 2022 Oct 28.