1 - "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2 - Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, Cardiology Department, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, Cardiology Department, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Med Ultrason. 2021 Nov 25;23(4):424-429. doi: 10.11152/mu-2888. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a relatively young technique used during complex electrophysiology proce-dures, such as atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of ICE modifies the radia-tion exposure at the beginning of the learning curve in AF ablation.
In this retrospective study, 52 patients, in which catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF was performed, were included. For 26 patients we used ICE guidance together with fluoroscopy, whereas for the remaining 26 patients we used fluoroscopy alone, all supported by electroanatomical mapping. We compared total procedure time and radiation exposure, including fluoroscopy dose and time between the two groups and along the learning curve.
Most of the patients included were suffering from paroxysmal AF (40, 76%), pulmonary vein isolation being performed in all patients, without secondary ablation sites. The use of ICE was associated with a lower fluoroscopy dose (11839.60±6100.6 vs. 16260.43±8264.5 mGy, p=0.041) and time (28.00±12.5 vs. 42.93±12.7 minutes, p=0.001), whereas the mean procedure time was similar between the two groups (181.54±50.3 vs 197.31±49.8 minutes, p=0.348). Radiation exposure was lower in the last 9 months compared to the first 9 months of the study (p<0.01), decreasing gradually along the learning curve.
The use of ICE lowers radiation exposure in AF catheter ablation from the beginning of the learning curve, without any difference in terms of acute safety or efficacy. Aware-ness towards closest to zero radiation exposure during electrophysiology procedures should increase in order to achieve better protection for both patient and medical staff.
心腔内超声心动图(ICE)是一种在复杂电生理程序中使用的相对较新的技术,例如心房颤动(AF)消融。本研究旨在评估在 AF 消融的学习曲线开始时使用 ICE 是否会改变辐射暴露。
在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了 52 名接受阵发性或持续性 AF 导管消融的患者。对于 26 名患者,我们使用 ICE 指导与透视相结合,而对于其余 26 名患者,我们仅使用透视,所有患者均支持电解剖标测。我们比较了两组患者的总手术时间和辐射暴露,包括透视剂量和透视时间,并沿学习曲线进行比较。
大多数患者患有阵发性 AF(40 例,76%),所有患者均进行了肺静脉隔离,无继发性消融部位。使用 ICE 与较低的透视剂量(11839.60±6100.6 与 16260.43±8264.5 mGy,p=0.041)和时间(28.00±12.5 与 42.93±12.7 分钟,p=0.001)相关,而两组的平均手术时间相似(181.54±50.3 与 197.31±49.8 分钟,p=0.348)。研究的前 9 个月与后 9 个月相比,辐射暴露降低(p<0.01),并且随着学习曲线的逐渐降低。
在 AF 导管消融的学习曲线开始时,使用 ICE 可以降低辐射暴露,而在急性安全性或疗效方面没有差异。为了更好地保护患者和医务人员,在电生理程序中应提高对零辐射暴露的认识。