Rehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Department of Physical Therapy Faculty of Rehabilitation of Kobe International University, Japan.
J Biomech. 2021 May 7;120:110386. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110386. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
There has been no systematic review evaluating the efficacy of electromyography (EMG) biofeedback after knee surgery recently. This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether EMG-biofeedback is effective for improving the range of motion (ROM), physical function, and pain relief in patients after knee. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of EMG-biofeedback after any knee surgery were retrieved from EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest. This review identified 773 unique studies, and six RCTs were in the final meta-analysis. EMG-Biofeedback treatment has a significant difference compared to other rehabilitation therapy in knee ROM improving (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI = -0.82 to -0.14, p = 0.006, I = 37%). Moreover, there was no significant difference in pain (SMD = -0.33, 95% CI = -0.67 to0.02, p = 0.07, I = 41%) and physical function scores (MD = 1.83, 95% CI = -3.48 to7.14, p = 0.50, I = 0%). The results illustrate that EMG-biofeedback can improve knee ROM in patients after knee surgery. However, it is not superior to other rehabilitation methods for pain relief and physical function improvement.
最近,没有系统评价评估膝手术后肌电图(EMG)生物反馈的疗效。本荟萃分析旨在确定 EMG 生物反馈是否对改善膝关节手术后患者的关节活动度(ROM)、身体功能和缓解疼痛有效。从 EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、物理治疗证据数据库、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 ProQuest 检索评估任何膝手术后 EMG 生物反馈效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。本综述共确定了 773 项独特的研究,其中 6 项 RCT 纳入最终的荟萃分析。与其他康复治疗相比,EMG 生物反馈治疗在改善膝关节 ROM 方面有显著差异(SMD=-0.48,95%CI=-0.82 至-0.14,p=0.006,I²=37%)。此外,在疼痛(SMD=-0.33,95%CI=-0.67 至 0.02,p=0.07,I²=41%)和身体功能评分(MD=1.83,95%CI=-3.48 至 7.14,p=0.50,I²=0%)方面,EMG 生物反馈与其他康复方法之间没有显著差异。结果表明,EMG 生物反馈可改善膝关节手术后患者的膝关节 ROM,但在缓解疼痛和改善身体功能方面并不优于其他康复方法。