Williams Gregory E, Uliaszek Amanda A
University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1144-1157. doi: 10.1177/10731911211003949. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Emotion differentiation (ED) has been defined in terms of two abilities: (a) making fine-grained distinctions emotional experiences, and (b) describing emotional experiences with a high degree of nuance and specificity. Research to date has almost exclusively focused on the former, with little attention paid to the latter. The current study sought to address this discrepant focus by testing two novel measures of negative ED (i.e., based on negatively valenced emotions only) via coded open-ended descriptions of individual emotional experiences, both past and present. As part of a larger study, 307 participants completed written descriptions of two negative emotional experiences, as well as a measure of emotion regulation difficulties and indices of psychopathological symptom severity. Negative ED ability, as measured via consistency between emotional experiences, was found to be unrelated to negative ED ability exhibited via coding of language within experiences. Within-experience negative ED may offer an incrementally adaptive function to that of ED between emotional experiences. Implications for ED theory are discussed.
情绪分化(ED)已根据两种能力进行了定义:(a)对情绪体验做出细致入微的区分,以及(b)以高度的细微差别和特异性描述情绪体验。迄今为止的研究几乎完全集中在前者,而对后者关注甚少。当前的研究试图通过对过去和现在的个体情绪体验进行编码的开放式描述来测试两种新的负面情绪分化测量方法(即仅基于负性情绪),以解决这种不一致的关注点。作为一项更大规模研究的一部分,307名参与者完成了对两种负面情绪体验的书面描述,以及一项情绪调节困难测量和心理病理症状严重程度指标。通过情绪体验之间的一致性来衡量的负面情绪分化能力,被发现与通过体验中的语言编码所表现出的负面情绪分化能力无关。体验内的负面情绪分化可能比情绪体验之间的情绪分化具有递增的适应功能。文中讨论了对情绪分化理论的启示。