Ventura-Bort Carlos, Wendt Julia, Weymar Mathias
Department of Biological Psychology and Affective Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 18;12:712418. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712418. eCollection 2021.
The theory of constructed emotions suggests that different psychological components, including core affect (mental and neural representations of bodily changes), and conceptualization (meaning-making based on prior experiences and semantic knowledge), are involved in the formation of emotions. However, little is known about their role in experiencing emotions. In the current study, we investigated how individual differences in interoceptive sensibility and emotional conceptualization (as potential correlates of these components) interact to moderate three important aspects of emotional experiences: emotional intensity (strength of emotion felt), arousal (degree of activation), and granularity (ability to differentiate emotions with precision). To this end, participants completed a series of questionnaires assessing interoceptive sensibility and emotional conceptualization and underwent two emotion experience tasks, which included standardized material (emotion differentiation task; ED task) and self-experienced episodes (day reconstruction method; DRM). Correlational analysis showed that individual differences in interoceptive sensibility and emotional conceptualization were related to each other. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed two independent factors that were referred to as sensibility and monitoring. The Sensibility factor, interpreted as beliefs about the accuracy of an individual in detecting internal physiological and emotional states, predicted higher granularity for negative words. The Monitoring factor, interpreted as the tendency to focus on the internal states of an individual, was negatively related to emotional granularity and intensity. Additionally, Sensibility scores were more strongly associated with greater well-being and adaptability measures than Monitoring scores. Our results indicate that independent processes underlying individual differences in interoceptive sensibility and emotional conceptualization contribute to emotion experiencing.
建构情绪理论认为,不同的心理成分,包括核心情感(身体变化的心理和神经表征)和概念化(基于先前经验和语义知识的意义建构),都参与了情绪的形成。然而,对于它们在情绪体验中的作用却知之甚少。在当前的研究中,我们调查了内感受敏感性和情绪概念化方面的个体差异(作为这些成分的潜在相关因素)如何相互作用,以调节情绪体验的三个重要方面:情绪强度(感受到的情绪强度)、唤醒度(激活程度)和粒度(精确区分情绪的能力)。为此,参与者完成了一系列评估内感受敏感性和情绪概念化的问卷,并进行了两项情绪体验任务,其中包括标准化材料(情绪区分任务;ED任务)和自我经历的事件(日重建法;DRM)。相关分析表明,内感受敏感性和情绪概念化方面的个体差异相互关联。主成分分析(PCA)揭示了两个独立的因素,分别称为敏感性和监控性。敏感性因素被解释为个体对检测内部生理和情绪状态准确性的信念,它预测了负面词汇的更高粒度。监控性因素被解释为关注个体内部状态的倾向,它与情绪粒度和强度呈负相关。此外,与监控性得分相比,敏感性得分与更高的幸福感和适应性指标的关联更强。我们的结果表明,内感受敏感性和情绪概念化方面个体差异背后的独立过程有助于情绪体验。