Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology & Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Montessorilaan 3, 6525, HR, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03752-2.
There is sufficient meta-analytic evidence that antenatal interventions for women at risk (selective prevention) or for women with severe psychological symptoms (indicated prevention) are effective in reducing postpartum distress. However, women without risk or severe psychological symptoms might also experience distress. This meta-analysis focused on the effectiveness of preventive psychological interventions offered to universal populations of pregnant women on symptoms of depression, anxiety, and general stress. Paternal and infant outcomes were also included.
We included 12 universal prevention studies in the meta-analysis, incorporating a total of 2559 pregnant women.
Overall, ten studies included depression as an outcome measure, five studies included stress, and four studies anxiety. There was a moderate effect of preventive interventions implemented during pregnancy on the combined measure of maternal distress (d = .52), on depressive symptoms (d = .50), and on stress (d = .52). The effect on anxiety (d = .30) was smaller. The effects were not associated with intervention timing, intervention type, intervention delivery mode, timing of post-test, and methodological quality. The number of studies including partner and/or infant outcomes was too low to assess their effectiveness.
This meta-analysis suggests that universal prevention during pregnancy is effective on decreasing symptoms of maternal distress compared to routine care, at least with regard to depression. While promising, the results with regard to anxiety and stress are based on a considerably lower number of studies, and should thus be interpreted with caution. More research is needed on preventing other types of maternal distress beyond depression. Furthermore, there is a lack of research with regard to paternal distress. Also, given the large variety in interventions, more research is needed on which elements of universal prevention work. Finally, as maternal distress symptoms can affect infant development, it is important to investigate whether the positive effects of the preventive interventions extend from mother to infant.
International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42018098861.
有充分的荟萃分析证据表明,针对有风险的女性(选择性预防)或有严重心理症状的女性(指征性预防)的产前干预措施可有效减少产后困扰。然而,没有风险或严重心理症状的女性也可能会感到困扰。本荟萃分析专注于对有普遍妊娠妇女提供预防心理干预措施对抑郁、焦虑和一般压力症状的有效性。同时也包括了父亲和婴儿的结果。
我们将 12 项普遍预防研究纳入荟萃分析,共纳入 2559 名孕妇。
总体而言,有 10 项研究将抑郁作为结果测量指标,5 项研究包括压力,4 项研究焦虑。在妊娠期间实施的预防干预措施对产妇困扰的综合指标(d=0.52)、抑郁症状(d=0.50)和压力(d=0.52)有中度影响。对焦虑(d=0.30)的影响较小。这些效果与干预时间、干预类型、干预提供模式、后测时间和方法学质量无关。包括伴侣和/或婴儿结果的研究数量太少,无法评估其有效性。
本荟萃分析表明,与常规护理相比,妊娠期间的普遍预防措施在降低产妇困扰症状方面是有效的,至少在抑郁方面是如此。虽然有希望,但关于焦虑和压力的结果基于数量较少的研究,因此应谨慎解释。需要更多的研究来预防除抑郁以外的其他类型的产妇困扰。此外,父亲的困扰研究也缺乏。此外,由于干预措施种类繁多,需要更多的研究来了解普遍预防措施的哪些要素起作用。最后,由于产妇困扰症状会影响婴儿发育,因此有必要研究预防干预措施的积极效果是否从母亲扩展到婴儿。
国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册号:CRD42018098861。