Department of Acupuncture, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Institute of Acupuncture and Anesthesia, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03277-3.
Acupuncture for post-stroke depression (PSD) has been evolving, but uncertainty remains. To assess the existing evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for PSD, we sought to draw conclusions by synthesizing RCTs.
An exhaustive literature search was conducted in seven electronic databases from their inception dates to April 19, 2020, to identify systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) on this topic. The primary RCTs included in the SRs/MAs were identified. We also conducted a supplementary search for RCTs published from January 1, 2015, to May 12, 2020. Two reviewers extracted data separately and pooled data using RevMan 5.3 software. The quality of evidence was critically appraised with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
A total of 17 RCTs involving 1402 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that participants who received a combination of acupuncture and conventional treatments exhibited significantly lower scores on the HAM-D, HAM-D and HAM-D (MD, - 5.08 [95% CI, - 6.48 to - 3.67], I = 0%), (MD, - 9.72 [95% CI, - 14.54 to - 4.91], I = 65%) and (MD, - 2.72 [95% CI, - 3.61 to - 1.82], respectively) than those who received conventional treatment. However, there was no significant difference in acupuncture versus antidepressants in terms of the 17-item, 24-item and HAM-D scales (MD, - 0.43 [95% CI, - 1.61 to 0.75], I = 51%), (MD, - 3.09 [95% CI, - 10.81 to 4.63], I = 90%) and (MD, - 1.55 [95% CI, - 4.36 to 1.26], I = 95%, respectively). For adverse events, acupuncture was associated with fewer adverse events than antidepressants (RR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.39], I = 35%), but there was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse events between the combination of acupuncture and conventional treatments versus conventional treatments (RR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.21 to 1.83], I = 38%). The quality of evidence was low to very low due to the substantial heterogeneity among the included studies.
The current review indicates that acupuncture has greater effect on PSD and better safety profile than antidepressants, but high-quality evidence evaluating acupuncture for PSD is still needed.
针刺治疗中风后抑郁症(PSD)一直在发展,但仍存在不确定性。为了评估针刺治疗 PSD 的现有随机临床试验(RCT)证据,我们试图通过综合 RCT 来得出结论。
从七个电子数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,这些数据库的检索时间从其建立日期到 2020 年 4 月 19 日,以确定关于该主题的系统评价(SRs)和荟萃分析(MAs)。确定了纳入 SRs/MA 的主要 RCT。我们还对 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 12 日发表的 RCT 进行了补充检索。两位审查员分别提取数据,并使用 RevMan 5.3 软件对数据进行汇总。使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)系统对证据质量进行了批判性评估。
共纳入 17 项 RCT,涉及 1402 名患者。Meta 分析显示,接受针刺与常规治疗联合治疗的患者在 HAM-D、HAM-D 和 HAM-D 量表上的评分明显低于接受常规治疗的患者(MD,-5.08 [95%CI,-6.48 至-3.67],I=0%)、(MD,-9.72 [95%CI,-14.54 至-4.91],I=65%)和(MD,-2.72 [95%CI,-3.61 至-1.82],I=65%)。然而,在 17 项、24 项和 HAM-D 量表上,针刺与抗抑郁药之间的差异无统计学意义(MD,-0.43 [95%CI,-1.61 至 0.75],I=51%)、(MD,-3.09 [95%CI,-10.81 至 4.63],I=90%)和(MD,-1.55 [95%CI,-4.36 至 1.26],I=95%)。对于不良事件,针刺的不良事件发生率低于抗抑郁药(RR,0.16 [95%CI,0.07 至 0.39],I=35%),但针刺与常规治疗联合与常规治疗相比,不良事件的发生无显著差异(RR,0.63 [95%CI,0.21 至 1.83],I=38%)。由于纳入研究之间存在很大的异质性,证据质量为低至极低。
目前的综述表明,针刺治疗 PSD 的效果优于抗抑郁药,且安全性更好,但仍需要高质量的证据来评估针刺治疗 PSD。