Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), University Hospital Essen, University Medicine Essen, Germany.
Ger Med Sci. 2021 Mar 2;19:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/000290. eCollection 2021.
In principle, persons wishing to participate in a clinical trial must give informed consent in advance after comprehensive information has been provided. Under certain conditions, it is possible to deviate from this requirement in the European Union (EU) in order to enable the participation of so-called vulnerable persons who are incapable of giving their informed consent. Kuthning et al. [1] have already dealt with general and specific aspects of vulnerable patients and the principle of informed consent in clinical trials. One group of vulnerable persons, for example, are adults temporarily or permanently incapable of giving consent due to their state of health. For a long period of time, no systematic and uniform legal basis for clinical trials existed in the EU as a whole. The Clinical Trials Directive (CTD) [2], adopted in 2001, aimed to change this by harmonizing all legal regulations on clinical trials applicable in the EU, but nevertheless allowing national deviations in implementation into national laws through opening clauses and aspects that were left unregulated. In view of the Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR) [3] which, according to the current status, will with high probability be applied from 2022 on, and which in future will be the legal basis for clinical trials with medicinal products in humans, applied directly in all EU member states, the necessity to take stock of the effects of the CTD was evident. The national deviations with regard to the participation of patients incapable of giving informed consent were investigated qualitatively and quantitatively by means of a systematic analysis of legislation in 16 EU countries and a retrospective database analysis of a European clinical trial registry over a ten-year observation period. Although the analysis initially showed a predominantly homogeneous picture, the differences between the EU member states became apparent in a detailed examination. The database analysis yielded a clear result, since in some countries the majority of clinical trials are carried out. The clearest difference was found between the legal analysis and the results of the evaluated clinical trials concerning adults who are permanently incapable of giving informed consent. A presumed association between the "degree of liberality" of the national law and the frequency of clinical trials conducted in the respective country could not be confirmed. In the past, the selection of countries for conducting a clinical trial was based less on legal requirements and more on experience and financial considerations.
原则上,希望参加临床试验的人必须在全面提供信息后提前给予知情同意。在某些情况下,在欧盟(EU)有可能偏离这一要求,以便使所谓的无能力给予知情同意的弱势人群能够参与。Kuthning 等人[1]已经讨论了临床试验中弱势患者和知情同意原则的一般和具体方面。例如,一组弱势人群是由于健康状况而暂时或永久无法同意的成年人。在很长一段时间内,整个欧盟都没有系统和统一的临床试验法律基础。2001 年通过的《临床试验指令》(CTD)[2]旨在通过协调适用于欧盟的所有临床试验法律规定来改变这一状况,但通过开放条款和未规范的方面允许在国家法律中实施国家差异。鉴于《临床试验条例》(CTR)[3],根据目前的情况,该条例很可能从 2022 年开始适用,并且未来将成为在所有欧盟成员国直接适用的人类用药品临床试验的法律基础,因此有必要对 CTD 的影响进行评估。通过对欧盟 16 个国家的立法进行系统分析和对 10 年观察期内的一个欧洲临床试验注册库进行回顾性数据库分析,对不能给予知情同意的患者参与方面的国家差异进行了定性和定量调查。尽管分析最初显示出一个主要是同质的画面,但在详细审查中,欧盟成员国之间的差异变得明显。数据库分析得出了一个明确的结果,因为在一些国家进行了大多数临床试验。在永久性无能力给予知情同意的成年人方面,法律分析和评估临床试验的结果之间存在最明显的差异。不能证实国家法律的“宽松程度”与在各自国家进行的临床试验频率之间存在假定的关联。过去,选择国家进行临床试验的依据更多的是经验和财务考虑,而不是法律要求。