Department of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of General Surgery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Oct;4(5):e1376. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1376. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
Intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) followed by hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) provides the shortest possible time of adjuvant breast irradiation. The efficacy of either method has been described in previous reports; however, to our knowledge, the efficacy of combined therapy has not been reported.
To compare the toxicity and cosmetic outcome of IOERT as a tumor bed boost followed by HWBI with conventional whole breast irradiation (CWBI) followed by external electron tumor bed boost (EETBB) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with invasive breast cancer.
In 2019, a prospective noninferiority trial (IRCT20180919041070N2) was started. After BCS, early-stage breast cancer patients were treated by IOERT (10 Gy) and HWBI (42.56 Gy in 16 fractions) or CWBI (50 Gy in 25 fraction) and EETBB (10 Gy in 5) in a double-arm design. Acute/late toxicity and cosmetic outcome were evaluated by common toxicity criteria (CTC) after 1-year follow-up (FUP) at the level of p < .05.
Of 60 eligible patients, 30 were allocated to each group. Regarding acute effects after a median FUP of 12 months, CTC-score of grade II-III erythema (p = .001) and desquamation (p = .005) were significantly higher in CWBI+EETBB compared to IOERT+ HWBI. However, there were no significant differences at the end of radiotherapy and after 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year. Cosmetic outcome after radiation was similar in both groups mostly rating as good/excellent after 1-year FUP.
Boost-IOERT/HWBI regimen has comparable acute and late treatment toxicity profiles compared to the CWBI.
术中电子放射治疗(IOERT)联合分次全乳照射(HWBI)可提供最短的辅助乳腺照射时间。这两种方法的疗效已在以前的报告中描述;然而,据我们所知,联合治疗的疗效尚未报道。
比较 IOERT 作为肿瘤床加量后行 HWBI 与常规全乳照射(CWBI)后行外电子肿瘤床加量(EETBB)在保乳手术后(BCS)浸润性乳腺癌患者中的毒性和美容效果。
2019 年,启动了一项前瞻性非劣效性试验(IRCT20180919041070N2)。BCS 后,早期乳腺癌患者采用 IOERT(10 Gy)和 HWBI(42.56 Gy 分 16 次)或 CWBI(50 Gy 分 25 次)联合 EETBB(10 Gy 分 5 次)进行双臂设计。急性/晚期毒性和美容效果通过 CTC 标准在 1 年随访(FUP)时进行评估(p <.05)。
60 名合格患者中,30 名被分配到每组。中位 FUP 12 个月后,CWBI+EETBB 组的 CTC 评分 II-III 级红斑(p =.001)和脱屑(p =.005)显著高于 IOERT+HWBI 组。然而,在放疗结束时以及 1 个月、6 个月和 1 年后,两组间无显著差异。两组的放射后美容效果相似,1 年 FUP 后大多评为良好/优秀。
与 CWBI 相比,BOOST-IOERT/HWBI 方案具有相似的急性和晚期治疗毒性特征。