Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
West Health Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jul;69(7):1982-1992. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17140. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Hospital at Home (HaH) is a growing model of care with proven patient benefits. However, for the types of services required to provide an episode of HaH, full Medicare reimbursement is traditionally paid only if care is provided in inpatient facilities.
This project identifies HaH services that could be reimbursable under Medicare to inform episodic care within fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare.
All data are derived from acute services provided from the Mount Sinai HaH program between 2014 and 2017 as part of a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) demonstration program.
The sample was limited to patients with one of the following five admitting diagnoses: urinary tract infection (n = 70), pneumonia (n = 60), cellulitis (n = 45), heart failure (n = 37), and chronic lung disease (n = 24) for a total of 236 acute episodes.
HaH services were inventoried from three sources: electronic medical records, Medicare billing and itemized vendor billing. For each admitting diagnosis, four reimbursement scenarios were evaluated: (1) FFS Medicare without a home health episode, (2) FFS Medicare with a home health episode, (3) two-sided risk ACO with a home health episode, and (4) two-sided risk ACO without a home health episode.
Across diagnoses, there were 1.5-1.9 MD visits and 1.5-2.7 nursing visits per episode. The Medicare FFS model without home health care had the lowest reimbursement potential ($964-$1604) per episode. The Medicare fee-for-service within ACO models with home health care had the greatest potential for reimbursement $4519-$4718. There was limited variation in costs by diagnosis.
Though existing payment models might be used to pay for many HaH acute services, significant gaps in reimbursement remain. Extending the benefits of HaH to the Medicare beneficiaries that are likely to derive the greatest benefit will require new payment models for FFS Medicare.
医院居家(HaH)是一种日益发展的护理模式,具有已证实的患者获益。然而,对于提供 HaH 所需的服务类型,传统上只有在住院设施中提供护理时,医疗保险才会全额报销。
本项目确定了 HaH 服务,这些服务可通过医疗保险报销,以便为医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)模式下的医疗期提供信息。
所有数据均来自 2014 年至 2017 年间西奈山 HaH 计划提供的急性服务,作为医疗保险和医疗补助创新中心(CMMI)示范计划的一部分。
该样本仅限于以下五种入院诊断之一的患者:尿路感染(n=70)、肺炎(n=60)、蜂窝织炎(n=45)、心力衰竭(n=37)和慢性肺病(n=24),总计 236 个急性发作。
从三个来源对 HaH 服务进行了清查:电子病历、医疗保险计费和分项供应商计费。对于每种入院诊断,评估了四种报销方案:(1)无家庭健康期的 FFS 医疗保险,(2)有家庭健康期的 FFS 医疗保险,(3)双边风险 ACO 有家庭健康期,(4)双边风险 ACO 无家庭健康期。
在各种诊断中,每个医疗期有 1.5-1.9 次 MD 就诊和 1.5-2.7 次护理就诊。没有家庭健康护理的医疗保险 FFS 模式的报销潜力最低(每个医疗期 964-1604 美元)。有家庭健康护理的医疗保险 ACO 模式的报销潜力最大,为 4519-4718 美元。不同诊断的费用变化有限。
尽管现有支付模式可能用于支付许多 HaH 急性服务,但报销仍存在重大差距。为那些可能受益最大的 Medicare 受益人扩大 HaH 的益处,将需要为 FFS Medicare 制定新的支付模式。