Famadas Joanna Case, Frick Kevin D, Haydar Ziad R, Nicewander David, Ballard David, Boult Chad
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008 Dec;20(6):556-61. doi: 10.1007/BF03324884.
To evaluate the effect of interdisciplinary outpatient geriatrics on the use, cost, and quality of health services in a fee-for-service (FFS) environment of two networks of primary care clinics operated by a not-for-profit provider organization in Dallas County, Texas.
The Senior Health Network (SHN) provides interdisciplinary primary care to patients aged 55 years or older; the Health Texas Provider Network (HTPN) provides "usual" primary care to patients of all ages. We conducted a two-year retrospective cohort study of 13,098 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who had 2+ visits to one of the networks in 2000. In the SHN, interdisciplinary teams supplemented primary care with social services, specialized clinics, and health education. We compared the use, cost and quality of health services, as reflected by paid Medicare claims, provided to eligible patients in the SHN vs the HTPN.
Medicare payments for hospital, skilled nursing facility, and home health care services were lower for SHN patients than HTPN patients (-32.7%, -19.8%, and -23.8%, respectively, p<or=0.05). SHN patients had a lower likelihood of admission to hospitals for treatment of five "ambulatory care sensitive conditions" (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58- 0.81), and they were less likely to receive several preventive services. Total Medicare payments for the two cohorts did not differ significantly.
Interdisciplinary outpatient geriatric care in a FFS setting has the potential to avert hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions and to reduce Medicare payments for hospital, skilled nursing facility, and home health care services.
在德克萨斯州达拉斯县由一家非营利性医疗服务机构运营的两个初级保健诊所网络的按服务收费(FFS)环境中,评估跨学科门诊老年医学对医疗服务使用、成本及质量的影响。
高级健康网络(SHN)为55岁及以上患者提供跨学科初级保健服务;德州医疗服务提供者网络(HTPN)为所有年龄段患者提供“常规”初级保健服务。我们对2000年在其中一个网络就诊2次及以上的13,098名按服务收费的医疗保险受益人进行了为期两年的回顾性队列研究。在SHN中,跨学科团队通过社会服务、专科诊所及健康教育对初级保健进行补充。我们比较了SHN和HTPN中符合条件患者的医疗服务使用情况、成本及质量,这些数据通过医疗保险付费申请反映。
SHN患者的医院、专业护理机构及家庭医疗保健服务的医疗保险支付费用低于HTPN患者(分别低-32.7%、-19.8%和-23.8%,p≤0.05)。SHN患者因五种“门诊护理敏感疾病”入院治疗的可能性较低(调整后比值比0.69,95%置信区间0.58 - 0.81),且接受几种预防性服务的可能性也较小。两个队列的医疗保险总支付费用无显著差异。
在FFS模式下的跨学科门诊老年护理有潜力避免因门诊护理敏感疾病而住院,并减少医院、专业护理机构及家庭医疗保健服务的医疗保险支付费用。