Suppr超能文献

情绪故事板:一种检验情绪社会判断的方法。

The emotion storyboard: A method to examine social judgments of emotion.

机构信息

William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America.

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 2;16(4):e0249294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249294. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

As perceivers, we need to understand context to make social judgments about emotion, such as judging whether emotion is appropriate. We propose a graphic novel-like method, the emotion storyboard, for use in research on social judgments of emotion. Across two studies, participants were randomly assigned to read emotion storyboards or written vignettes to compare the efficacy of the emotion storyboard to that of vignettes in studies on social judgments of emotion. In Study 1, undergraduates (N = 194) answered comprehension questions and rated story clarity and immersion. Participants also made social judgments of emotion by rating main character emotion control and appropriateness of intensity. To further compare the efficacy of the methods, in Study 2, Amazon Mechanical Turk workers (N = 213) answered comprehension questions while response times were recorded, rated clarity, answered a race manipulation check, and rated main character emotion type appropriateness. Overall, emotion storyboards resulted in greater clarity ratings, greater race manipulation check accuracy, and in some instances, enhanced comprehension and comprehension response times relative to vignettes. In emotion storyboards, main character emotion was rated more controlled and more appropriate in intensity, but not different in emotion type appropriateness, than in vignettes. Overall, the method offers a new method of examining social elements of emotion that enhances comprehension and maximizes experimental efficiency.

摘要

作为感知者,我们需要理解语境才能对情绪做出社会判断,例如判断情绪是否合适。我们提出了一种类似漫画小说的方法,即情绪情节串联图板,用于研究情绪的社会判断。在两项研究中,参与者被随机分配阅读情绪情节串联图板或书面小插曲,以比较情绪情节串联图板在情绪社会判断研究中的效果与小插曲的效果。在研究 1 中,本科生(N=194)回答了理解问题,并对情节的清晰度和沉浸感进行了评分。参与者还通过对主要角色的情绪控制和强度的适当性进行评分,对情绪进行了社会判断。为了进一步比较这些方法的效果,在研究 2 中,亚马逊土耳其机器人工人(N=213)在回答理解问题的同时记录了反应时间,对清晰度进行了评分,回答了种族操纵检查,并对主要角色的情绪类型适当性进行了评分。总的来说,情绪情节串联图板的清晰度评分更高,种族操纵检查的准确性更高,在某些情况下,理解和理解反应时间也得到了提高,而与小插曲相比。总的来说,这种方法提供了一种新的方法来检验情绪的社会元素,增强了理解并最大限度地提高了实验效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2fd/8018665/f71c8538317e/pone.0249294.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验