Sollmann Nico, Rayudu Nithin Manohar, Yeung Long Yu, Sekuboyina Anjany, Burian Egon, Dieckmeyer Michael, Löffler Maximilian T, Schwaiger Benedikt J, Gersing Alexandra S, Kirschke Jan S, Baum Thomas, Subburaj Karupppasamy
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 6;11(3):455. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030455.
Assessment of osteoporosis-associated fracture risk during clinical routine is based on the evaluation of clinical risk factors and T-scores, as derived from measurements of areal bone mineral density (aBMD). However, these parameters are limited in their ability to identify patients at high fracture risk. Finite element models (FEMs) have shown to improve bone strength prediction beyond aBMD. This study aims to investigate whether FEM measurements at the lumbar spine can predict the biomechanical strength of functional spinal units (FSUs) with incidental osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) along the thoracolumbar spine. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) data of 11 patients (5 females and 6 males, median age: 67 years) who underwent MDCT twice (median interval between baseline and follow-up MDCT: 18 months) and sustained an incidental osteoporotic VF between baseline and follow-up scanning were used. Based on baseline MDCT data, two FSUs consisting of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs (IVDs) were modeled: one standardly capturing L1-IVD-L2-IVD-L3 (FSU_L1-L3) and one modeling the incidentally fractured vertebral body at the center of the FSU (FSU_F). Furthermore, volumetric BMD (vBMD) derived from MDCT, FEM-based displacement, and FEM-based load of the single vertebrae L1 to L3 were determined. Statistically significant correlations (adjusted for a BMD ratio of fracture/L1-L3 segments) were revealed between the FSU_F and mean load of L1 to L3 (r = 0.814, = 0.004) and the mean vBMD of L1 to L3 (r = 0.745, = 0.013), whereas there was no statistically significant association between the FSU_F and FSU_L1-L3 or between FSU_F and the mean displacement of L1 to L3 ( > 0.05). In conclusion, FEM measurements of single vertebrae at the lumbar spine may be able to predict the biomechanical strength of incidentally fractured vertebral segments along the thoracolumbar spine, while FSUs seem to predict only segment-specific fracture risk.
临床常规中骨质疏松相关骨折风险的评估基于临床风险因素和T值,T值来自于面积骨密度(aBMD)测量。然而,这些参数识别高骨折风险患者的能力有限。有限元模型(FEM)已显示出能够在aBMD之外改善骨强度预测。本研究旨在调查腰椎的FEM测量是否能够预测胸腰椎段伴有偶发性骨质疏松性椎体骨折(VF)的功能性脊柱单元(FSU)的生物力学强度。使用了11例患者(5例女性和6例男性,中位年龄:67岁)的多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)数据,这些患者接受了两次MDCT检查(基线与随访MDCT之间的中位间隔时间:18个月),且在基线和随访扫描之间发生了偶发性骨质疏松性VF。基于基线MDCT数据,对由椎体和椎间盘(IVD)组成的两个FSU进行建模:一个标准地捕获L1-IVD-L2-IVD-L3(FSU_L1-L3),另一个对FSU中心的偶发性骨折椎体进行建模(FSU_F)。此外,还确定了从MDCT得出的体积骨密度(vBMD)、基于FEM的单个椎体L1至L3的位移和基于FEM的载荷。在FSU_F与L1至L3的平均载荷(r = 0.814,P = 0.004)以及L1至L3的平均vBMD(r = 0.745,P = 0.013)之间发现了具有统计学意义的相关性(针对骨折/L1-L3节段的aBMD比值进行了调整),而在FSU_F与FSU_L1-L3之间或FSU_F与L1至L3的平均位移之间未发现具有统计学意义的关联(P > 0.05)。总之,腰椎单个椎体的FEM测量可能能够预测胸腰椎段偶发性骨折椎体节段的生物力学强度,而FSU似乎仅能预测节段特异性骨折风险。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022-6-1
Med Image Anal. 2021-10
Osteoporos Int. 2020-2
Lancet. 2019-1-26
Osteoporos Int. 2018-10-10
Clin Neuroradiol. 2018-8-21