Kuo Pei-Fen, Huang Tzu-En, Putra I Gede Brawiswa
Geomatics Department, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 6;21(5):1853. doi: 10.3390/s21051853.
In order to minimize the impacts of climate change on various crops, farmers must learn to monitor environmental conditions accurately and effectively, especially for plants that are particularly sensitive to the weather. On-site sensors and weather stations are two common methods for collecting data and observing weather conditions. Although sensors are capable of collecting accurate weather information on-site, they can be costly and time-consuming to install and maintain. An alternative is to use the online weather stations, which are usually government-owned and free to the public; however, their accuracy is questionable because they are frequently located far from the farmers' greenhouses. Therefore, we compared the accuracy of kriging estimators using the weather station data (collected by the Central Weather Bureau) to local sensors located in the greenhouse. The spatio-temporal kriging method was used to interpolate temperature data. The real value at the central point of the greenhouse was used for comparison. According to our results, the accuracy of the weather station estimator was slightly lower than that of the local sensor estimator. Farmers can obtain accurate estimators of environmental data by using on-site sensors; however, if they are unavailable, using a nearby weather station estimator is also acceptable.
为了尽量减少气候变化对各种作物的影响,农民必须学会准确有效地监测环境状况,特别是对于那些对天气特别敏感的植物。现场传感器和气象站是收集数据和观测天气状况的两种常见方法。虽然传感器能够在现场收集准确的天气信息,但安装和维护成本高且耗时。另一种选择是使用在线气象站,这些气象站通常归政府所有且对公众免费;然而,其准确性值得怀疑,因为它们往往离农民的温室很远。因此,我们将使用气象站数据(由中央气象局收集)的克里金估计器的准确性与温室中的本地传感器进行了比较。采用时空克里金方法对温度数据进行插值。以温室中心点的实际值进行比较。根据我们的结果,气象站估计器的准确性略低于本地传感器估计器。农民可以通过使用现场传感器获得准确的环境数据估计器;然而,如果没有现场传感器,使用附近气象站的估计器也是可以接受的。