Barrios Carmen Luz, Aguirre Valentina, Parra Alonso, Pavletic Carlos, Bustos-López Carlos, Perez Sandra, Urrutia Carla, Ramirez Josefa, Fatjó Jaume
Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Mayor, Camino La Pirámide 5750, Huechuraba 8580745, Chile.
Cátedra Fundación Affinity Animales y Salud, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Parque de Investigación Biomédica de Barcelona, C/Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 21;11(3):893. doi: 10.3390/ani11030893.
Dog bites are a major public health problem, with consequences such as physical injury, psychological trauma, transmission of zoonoses, infections, and economic costs. For this reason, it is necessary to develop preventive programs, which require quality information to support the authorities' decision-making and to raise public awareness about the application of the proposed measures. The objective of this review was to analyze the press, indexed and gray dog bite literature published during the 2013-2017 period. During that period, 385 articles from three sources of information were analyzed: Press literature, scientific literature, and gray literature. Of these, the greatest amount of information corresponding to the context and the aggressor animal was found in the press literature, where it was recorded that the greatest number of records reported in the Chilean articles were caused by potentially dangerous breeds (87.50%), having significant differences with the gray literature ( = 0.030), and in Spain, the greatest number of attacks was also made by potentially dangerous dogs 91.30% (21/23), statistically significant differences with the gray literature ( = 0.002) and with the indexed ( < 0.001). In the case of the scientific and gray literature, the greatest amount of information was found about the victim of the attack and the treatments applied to them. In these cases, the highest percentage of victims included in the reports contained both sexes for the two literatures (44.62% and 87.71%, respectively). Regarding the treatment applied, in the scientific literature in most of the reports, the patients received washings, rabies vaccine, and tetanus vaccine (46.26%) and presented significant differences in Chile with the information contained in the gray literature ( = 0.023), in Spain with the gray ( = 0.017) and with the press ( = 0.023). In conclusion, the press literature differs in multiple variables with the information reported in the scientific literature and, in some cases, with the gray literature. The reason why the material that is being distributed to the population would not coincide in multiple relevant variables in other literature and the representative reality of the problem is the basis for this topic.
犬咬伤是一个重大的公共卫生问题，会导致身体伤害、心理创伤、人畜共患病传播、感染以及经济成本等后果。因此，有必要制定预防计划，这需要高质量的信息来支持当局的决策，并提高公众对所提议措施应用的认识。本综述的目的是分析2013年至2017年期间发表的新闻报道、索引文献和灰色文献中的犬咬伤相关内容。在此期间，对来自三个信息来源的385篇文章进行了分析：新闻文献、科学文献和灰色文献。其中，关于事件背景和肇事动物的信息在新闻文献中最多，据记录，智利文章中报道的记录数量最多的是由潜在危险品种造成的（87.50%），与灰色文献有显著差异（P = 0.030），在西班牙，攻击数量最多的也是潜在危险犬类（91.30%，21/23），与灰色文献有统计学显著差异（P = 0.002），与索引文献也有显著差异（P < 0.001）。在科学文献和灰色文献中，关于攻击受害者以及对他们所采取的治疗措施的信息最多。在这些情况下，两份文献中报告的受害者中最高比例都包含了两性（分别为44.62%和87.71%）。关于所采取的治疗措施，在科学文献中，大多数报告中患者接受了冲洗、狂犬病疫苗和破伤风疫苗（46.26%），在智利与灰色文献中的信息有显著差异（P = 0.023），在西班牙与灰色文献有差异（P = 0.017），与新闻文献也有差异（P = 0.023）。总之，新闻文献在多个变量上与科学文献以及在某些情况下与灰色文献所报道的信息不同。向公众传播的材料在多个相关变量上与其他文献以及该问题的代表性现实不一致的原因，是本主题的基础。
